可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 16771–16780

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

other

beneficiary education requirement per labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

The labor certification unequivocally requires a degree in elementary education. The Beneficiary's degree in family life does not satisfy this requirement. The two credential evaluations reach conflicting conclusions and the Petitioner failed to resolve that discrepancy with independent objective evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification unequivocally requires a degree in elementary education. The Beneficiary's degree in family life does not satisfy this requirement. The two credential evaluations reach conflicting conclusions and the Petitioner failed to resolve that discrepancy with independent objective evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-20_01_B5203; source_row=21616
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

other

ability to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

The new financial evidence showed negative net current assets and negative net revenues that would not establish ability to pay $51,380 in 2014 or 2015. The Sonegawa unusual-circumstances argument failed because the financial statements showed worsening, not improving, finances. The AC21 porting claim lacked corroborating evidence and was contradicted by W-2s and an employment letter.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The new financial evidence showed negative net current assets and negative net revenues that would not establish ability to pay $51,380 in 2014 or 2015. The Sonegawa unusual-circumstances argument failed because the financial statements showed worsening, not improving, finances. The AC21 porting claim lacked corroborating evidence and was contradicted by W-2s and an employment letter.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-20_01_B5203; source_row=21615
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他医生

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the Petitioner satisfied the leading role criterion as president and creative director of an advertising agency whose distinguished reputation is demonstrated through awards, news articles, and industry rankings.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner satisfied the leading role criterion as president and creative director of an advertising agency whose distinguished reputation is demonstrated through awards, news articles, and industry rankings.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=21610
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他医生

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the Petitioner met the published material criterion based on articles about him in professional publications.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner met the published material criterion based on articles about him in professional publications.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=21608
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他医生

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the Petitioner received nationally recognized awards, including a first-place award in a newspaper advertising competition, supported by media coverage demonstrating the level of recognition.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner received nationally recognized awards, including a first-place award in a newspaper advertising competition, supported by media coverage demonstrating the level of recognition.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=21607
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他医生

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the totality of evidence — including an acclaimed multi-decade career at distinguished agencies, significant awards, extensive professional press coverage, and service as a juror at major competitions — establishes the Petitioner's sustained national acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the Venezuelan advertising industry.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the totality of evidence — including an acclaimed multi-decade career at distinguished agencies, significant awards, extensive professional press coverage, and service as a juror at major competitions — establishes the Petitioner's sustained national acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the Venezuelan advertising industry.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=21612
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他医生

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary relative to others in the field

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the high salary criterion was met; the Petitioner's compensation was documented and confirmed by a salary survey to be significantly above the upper earnings range for Venezuelan creative directors.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the high salary criterion was met; the Petitioner's compensation was documented and confirmed by a salary survey to be significantly above the upper earnings range for Venezuelan creative directors.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=21611
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他医生

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the judging criterion was met; the Petitioner participated as a juror for multiple national and international competitions.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the judging criterion was met; the Petitioner participated as a juror for multiple national and international competitions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=21609
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Date of Beneficiary's Degree (diploma vs. completion of requirements)

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the statute and regulations use the terms 'degree' and 'official academic record' rather than 'diploma,' and that a case-specific analysis of the record demonstrated the Beneficiary completed all substantive requirements and the university approved his degree as of July 24, 2008.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the statute and regulations use the terms 'degree' and 'official academic record' rather than 'diploma,' and that a case-specific analysis of the record demonstrated the Beneficiary completed all substantive requirements and the university approved his degree as of July 24, 2008.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-18_01_B5203; source_row=21613
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Five Years of Post-Baccalaureate Qualifying Employment Experience

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the record did not reliably establish the Beneficiary's employment history due to inconsistencies between the labor certification, service certificate, and the Beneficiary's own sworn statement regarding employer identity and job titles during 2008–2013. Additionally, no required employer experience letters were submitted, and no evidence supported claimed employment during November 2013–November 2015.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the record did not reliably establish the Beneficiary's employment history due to inconsistencies between the labor certification, service certificate, and the Beneficiary's own sworn statement regarding employer identity and job titles during 2008–2013. Additionally, no required employer experience letters were submitted, and no evidence supported claimed employment during November 2013–November 2015.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-18_01_B5203; source_row=21614
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评