AAO found that the Petitioner did not provide evidence of her cumulative annual wages for a meaningful comparison, and failed to show how the short-term, isolated contracts represent significantly high remuneration compared to others in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner did not provide evidence of her cumulative annual wages for a meaningful comparison, and failed to show how the short-term, isolated contracts represent significantly high remuneration compared to others in the field.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that performing as one of the lead or supporting dancers in music videos, a documentary, and award shows did not establish a leading role for a distinguished organization overall, nor that the Petitioner was responsible for the success or standing of those organizations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that performing as one of the lead or supporting dancers in music videos, a documentary, and award shows did not establish a leading role for a distinguished organization overall, nor that the Petitioner was responsible for the success or standing of those organizations.
AAO found the humanitarian work evidence did not show influence or impact on the field at a level consistent with major significance. The recommendation letters praised her skills and talents but did not explain how her contributions or performances impacted the field. Having a unique skill set is insufficient without showing influence on the field.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the humanitarian work evidence did not show influence or impact on the field at a level consistent with major significance. The recommendation letters praised her skills and talents but did not explain how her contributions or performances impacted the field. Having a unique skill set is insufficient without showing influence on the field.
AAO rejected the claim of improper merits determination and found the recommendation letters merely praised the Petitioner's skills without explaining how her talents and performances constitute original contributions of major significance or how she has impacted the field. Having a unique or diverse skill set is not itself a contribution of major significance without showing impact on the field.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO rejected the claim of improper merits determination and found the recommendation letters merely praised the Petitioner's skills without explaining how her talents and performances constitute original contributions of major significance or how she has impacted the field. Having a unique or diverse skill set is not itself a contribution of major significance without showing impact on the field.
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the supporting documentation related to the television station and competition sponsorship, not to whether the awards themselves are nationally or internationally recognized prizes for excellence in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the supporting documentation related to the television station and competition sponsorship, not to whether the awards themselves are nationally or internationally recognized prizes for excellence in the field.
The Petitioner did not establish that her awards are nationally or internationally recognized as awards for excellence in her field. The competition award was at the college junior level, and the film award was not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not establish that her awards are nationally or internationally recognized as awards for excellence in her field. The competition award was at the college junior level, and the film award was not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence.
The website screenshots either listed her as a cast member without specifically discussing her or announced upcoming shows without mentioning her. Articles about a show rather than about the petitioner do not satisfy this criterion, and the websites were not shown to be professional or major trade publications or other major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The website screenshots either listed her as a cast member without specifically discussing her or announced upcoming shows without mentioning her. Articles about a show rather than about the petitioner do not satisfy this criterion, and the websites were not shown to be professional or major trade publications or other major media.
The Petitioner had not shown she was or is a member of the relevant union, and eligibility requirements must be satisfied from the time of filing. She also did not demonstrate that membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner had not shown she was or is a member of the relevant union, and eligibility requirements must be satisfied from the time of filing. She also did not demonstrate that membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.
The AAO withdrew the Director's finding. The Petitioner's roles in plays were self-described as 'supporting roles,' she did not show her film role was critical to an organization or establishment with a distinguished reputation, and her appearances in music videos were as an extra.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO withdrew the Director's finding. The Petitioner's roles in plays were self-described as 'supporting roles,' she did not show her film role was critical to an organization or establishment with a distinguished reputation, and her appearances in music videos were as an extra.
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
证据为何得到认可
AAO found that the Petitioner displayed her work at artistic venues and performed as one of the dancers at a redacted event, satisfying this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner displayed her work at artistic venues and performed as one of the dancers at a redacted event, satisfying this criterion.