可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 16871–16880

EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or significantly high remuneration

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO withdrew the director's finding, concluding the petitioner failed to provide documentation supporting the earnings claims or sufficient comparative data about remuneration of others in the field, and that comparing to average Russian wages generally does not satisfy the criterion's requirement of comparison against others in the petitioner's field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the director's finding, concluding the petitioner failed to provide documentation supporting the earnings claims or sufficient comparative data about remuneration of others in the field, and that comparing to average Russian wages generally does not satisfy the criterion's requirement of comparison against others in the petitioner's field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-20_01_B2203; source_row=21501
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能软件工程师

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay proffered wage — 2014

证据为何得到认可

AAO credited the wages paid to the Beneficiary ($63,574.94 in 2014) and found that only the gap of $44,294.06 needed to be covered. While the 2014 tax returns showed a net loss and net current liabilities, AAO applied the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances analysis and found that the Petitioner's long history of operation, growing gross receipts, CPA confirmation of an uncharacteristic 2014 downturn, and outstanding industr…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO credited the wages paid to the Beneficiary ($63,574.94 in 2014) and found that only the gap of $44,294.06 needed to be covered. While the 2014 tax returns showed a net loss and net current liabilities, AAO applied the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances analysis and found that the Petitioner's long history of operation, growing gross receipts, CPA confirmation of an uncharacteristic 2014 downturn, and outstanding industry reputation established ability to pay.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-20_01_B5203; source_row=21503
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能软件工程师

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay proffered wage — 2015

证据为何得到认可

The Petitioner's 2015 federal income tax returns reflected sufficient net income to cover the gap between the proffered wage and wages paid ($43,881.24 difference), establishing ability to pay for 2015.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's 2015 federal income tax returns reflected sufficient net income to cover the gap between the proffered wage and wages paid ($43,881.24 difference), establishing ability to pay for 2015.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-20_01_B5203; source_row=21504
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能软件工程师

审查的问题

other

Five years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience per labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

Of the four employer letters in the record, one failed to describe duties or verify full-time employment; one was sufficient (385 days of qualifying experience); one had conflicting dates and lacked full-time verification; and one covered employment not listed on the labor certification and included pre-baccalaureate periods. Collectively, the letters did not document five years of qualifying experience.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Of the four employer letters in the record, one failed to describe duties or verify full-time employment; one was sufficient (385 days of qualifying experience); one had conflicting dates and lacked full-time verification; and one covered employment not listed on the labor certification and included pre-baccalaureate periods. Collectively, the letters did not document five years of qualifying experience.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-20_01_B5203; source_row=21505
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display at artistic exhibitions or showcases

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the director's finding that the petitioner met this criterion through her operetta roles.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the director's finding that the petitioner met this criterion through her operetta roles.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-20_01_B2203; source_row=21500
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner met this criterion based on her service as a jury member at named competitions.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner met this criterion based on her service as a jury member at named competitions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-20_01_B2203; source_row=21499
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material in professional or major trade publications or major media

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the review of the petitioner's debut album in a Russian music magazine qualified as published material in major media, noting that other articles in the record described the publication as a popular magazine, meeting the preponderance standard.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the review of the petitioner's debut album in a Russian music magazine qualified as published material in major media, noting that other articles in the record described the publication as a popular magazine, meeting the preponderance standard.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-20_01_B2203; source_row=21498
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他大学教师

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner must show his work was on display at artistic exhibitions or showcases, but he failed to establish that the competitions or programs constituted artistic venues displaying his work.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner must show his work was on display at artistic exhibitions or showcases, but he failed to establish that the competitions or programs constituted artistic venues displaying his work.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=21495
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他大学教师

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

Although the Petitioner demonstrated a leading role with one organization, a certificate showing 'good standings' was insufficient to establish a distinguished reputation. As to the second organization, his committee chairperson role did not establish a leading or critical role, and evidence that it was the governing sports body in Nepal did not demonstrate a distinguished reputation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the Petitioner demonstrated a leading role with one organization, a certificate showing 'good standings' was insufficient to establish a distinguished reputation. As to the second organization, his committee chairperson role did not establish a leading or critical role, and evidence that it was the governing sports body in Nepal did not demonstrate a distinguished reputation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=21496
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他大学教师

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner's roles and positions are not determinative; he must show that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. The letters provided did not establish that membership conditions met the plain language of the regulation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's roles and positions are not determinative; he must show that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. The letters provided did not establish that membership conditions met the plain language of the regulation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=21492
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评