original contributions of major significance in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not establish how personal donations and involvement with charitable organizations relate to her field of comedic acting or demonstrate influence on the field at the level of major significance.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not establish how personal donations and involvement with charitable organizations relate to her field of comedic acting or demonstrate influence on the field at the level of major significance.
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner performed in a brief supporting role; her music video appearance did not constitute a leading or critical role for the band; and the television pilot role was prospective and undetailed.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner performed in a brief supporting role; her music video appearance did not constitute a leading or critical role for the band; and the television pilot role was prospective and undetailed.
The evidence of recommending comics and advising on a TV channel name did not constitute formal judging. The invitation to judge a film awards event post-dated the petition filing and no evidence showed she actually participated.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The evidence of recommending comics and advising on a TV channel name did not constitute formal judging. The invitation to judge a film awards event post-dated the petition filing and no evidence showed she actually participated.
high salary or significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not provide cumulative annual wage evidence and did not show how short-term contract payments represent significantly high remuneration compared to others in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not provide cumulative annual wage evidence and did not show how short-term contract payments represent significantly high remuneration compared to others in the field.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
SAG-AFTRA is based on working under a union-based contract rather than outstanding achievements, and the Petitioner did not show the national board consists of recognized national or international experts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
SAG-AFTRA is based on working under a union-based contract rather than outstanding achievements, and the Petitioner did not show the national board consists of recognized national or international experts.
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
证据为何得到认可
Although the Petitioner did not claim this criterion, AAO sua sponte found that the record showed she displayed her work on stage at artistic events, including a show in California.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the Petitioner did not claim this criterion, AAO sua sponte found that the record showed she displayed her work on stage at artistic events, including a show in California.
published material in professional or major trade publications or major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding because the sole relevant article lacked an author as required by the regulation, the 30,000 readership in Southern California was not shown to constitute a major medium, and other articles in the record did not pertain to the Petitioner individually.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding because the sole relevant article lacked an author as required by the regulation, the 30,000 readership in Southern California was not shown to constitute a major medium, and other articles in the record did not pertain to the Petitioner individually.
Schedule A, Group I notice of posting requirements
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found multiple deficiencies: failure to identify the employer, failure to specify the physical location of intended employment (multiple client worksites in various NY locations), failure to post at the actual worksites where the Beneficiary would provide services, and failure to provide an attestation about in-house media in light of the recruitment section of the Petitioner's website.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found multiple deficiencies: failure to identify the employer, failure to specify the physical location of intended employment (multiple client worksites in various NY locations), failure to post at the actual worksites where the Beneficiary would provide services, and failure to provide an attestation about in-house media in light of the recruitment section of the Petitioner's website.
AAO found the petitioner well positioned based on his notable experience attracting considerable interest in cardiovascular disease research, his past success in influential original research, extensive citation record (426 total citations at filing, many articles in top 10% by year), and testimony from independent experts who adopted his methods and protocols.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner well positioned based on his notable experience attracting considerable interest in cardiovascular disease research, his past success in influential original research, extensive citation record (426 total citations at filing, many articles in top 10% by year), and testimony from independent experts who adopted his methods and protocols.