可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 16981–16990

EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner's submitted translations were insufficient to demonstrate the materials were scholarly, and the publication's status as major media was not objectively corroborated.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's submitted translations were insufficient to demonstrate the materials were scholarly, and the publication's status as major media was not objectively corroborated.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-12_01_B2203; source_row=21375
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the letters did not sufficiently confirm that the Petitioner actually judged the competition, did not elaborate on the duties of committee members, and did not establish that mentorship or board activities constituted judging the work of others.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the letters did not sufficiently confirm that the Petitioner actually judged the competition, did not elaborate on the duties of committee members, and did not establish that mentorship or board activities constituted judging the work of others.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-12_01_B2203; source_row=21376
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the totality of the record — two brief articles, inconclusive judging activities, undocumented impact of authored works, and minimal media coverage of the company — did not demonstrate the sustained national or international acclaim required for this highly restrictive classification.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the totality of the record — two brief articles, inconclusive judging activities, undocumented impact of authored works, and minimal media coverage of the company — did not demonstrate the sustained national or international acclaim required for this highly restrictive classification.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-12_01_B2203; source_row=21378
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Advanced degree or equivalent (bachelor's plus five years post-baccalaureate progressive experience)

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the provisional certificate date (June 15, 2004) controls because the regulations reference 'degrees' not diplomas, and the record—including the provisional certificate, memoranda of marks, and a statement from the university's controller of examinations—demonstrated that all substantive degree requirements were completed and the degree approved by the university as of that date.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the provisional certificate date (June 15, 2004) controls because the regulations reference 'degrees' not diplomas, and the record—including the provisional certificate, memoranda of marks, and a statement from the university's controller of examinations—demonstrated that all substantive degree requirements were completed and the degree approved by the university as of that date. Using this date, the Beneficiary had over five years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience by the priority date.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-12_01_B5203; source_row=21379
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that the submitted articles in publications with significant circulation satisfy the plain language of the published material criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the submitted articles in publications with significant circulation satisfy the plain language of the published material criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-12_01_B2203; source_row=21374
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the record lacked documentation of the company's operations or reputation, no organizational chart confirming the Petitioner's hierarchical role, and that the university letter was conclusory without specific impact details and was dated after filing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the record lacked documentation of the company's operations or reputation, no organizational chart confirming the Petitioner's hierarchical role, and that the university letter was conclusory without specific impact details and was dated after filing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-12_01_B2203; source_row=21377
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足

案件事实

数学 / 统计博士

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a record of success or progress in his field or sufficient interest from relevant parties. His dissertation was viewed only 113 times with no evidence of significance, his publications lacked meaningful citation evidence, and his prior software work for cancer researchers was unrelated to his stated infrastructure research goals.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a record of success or progress in his field or sufficient interest from relevant parties. His dissertation was viewed only 113 times with no evidence of significance, his publications lacked meaningful citation evidence, and his prior software work for cancer researchers was unrelated to his stated infrastructure research goals.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-11_01_B5203; source_row=21372
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足

案件事实

数学 / 统计博士

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that while the Petitioner's qualifications may exceed minimum job requirements, he failed to show an urgent national interest in his specific efforts or contributions of sufficient value to benefit the nation even if qualified U.S. workers were available, and thus did not demonstrate the balance tips in favor of waiving labor certification.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that while the Petitioner's qualifications may exceed minimum job requirements, he failed to show an urgent national interest in his specific efforts or contributions of sufficient value to benefit the nation even if qualified U.S. workers were available, and thus did not demonstrate the balance tips in favor of waiving labor certification.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-11_01_B5203; source_row=21373
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the Petitioner's single qualifying award targeted young actors, his media coverage lacked recency, his performance roles did not distinguish him from other actors, and the commercial success evidence was insufficient, collectively failing to establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field status.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's single qualifying award targeted young actors, his media coverage lacked recency, his performance roles did not distinguish him from other actors, and the commercial success evidence was insufficient, collectively failing to establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field status.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-11_01_B2203; source_row=21370
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 商业成功未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 商业成功

commercial success in the performing arts

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO noted the criterion requires volume of sales or box office receipts and that the Petitioner failed to explain how his involvement in shows available on streaming platforms contributed to the overall popularity and success of those companies.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted the criterion requires volume of sales or box office receipts and that the Petitioner failed to explain how his involvement in shows available on streaming platforms contributed to the overall popularity and success of those companies.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-11_01_B2203; source_row=21369
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评