可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 17021–17030

EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record lacks documentation establishing the orchestra as an organization with a distinguished reputation, and the Petitioner's own appellate statement contradicted earlier evidence about who led the organization.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record lacks documentation establishing the orchestra as an organization with a distinguished reputation, and the Petitioner's own appellate statement contradicted earlier evidence about who led the organization.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=21338
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

Reference letters made conclusory claims but did not sufficiently explain how the Petitioner's roles were leading or critical or how his performances drove team success. Repeating regulatory language does not satisfy the burden of proof.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Reference letters made conclusory claims but did not sufficiently explain how the Petitioner's roles were leading or critical or how his performances drove team success. Repeating regulatory language does not satisfy the burden of proof.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_02_B2203; source_row=21343
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Adjudicator's Field Manual emphasizes the exhibitions or showcases must be artistic in nature, and the Petitioner pointed to no legal authority establishing that soccer matches are artistic.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Adjudicator's Field Manual emphasizes the exhibitions or showcases must be artistic in nature, and the Petitioner pointed to no legal authority establishing that soccer matches are artistic.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_02_B2203; source_row=21342
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the petitioner

AAO 为什么未被说服

The articles discussed soccer matches and teams rather than the Petitioner himself, mentioning him only briefly without biographical or competitive history. He also failed to establish that the magazine qualifies as major media or a major trade publication.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The articles discussed soccer matches and teams rather than the Petitioner himself, mentioning him only briefly without biographical or competitive history. He also failed to establish that the magazine qualifies as major media or a major trade publication.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_02_B2203; source_row=21341
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that the evidence of the Petitioner's adjudicator role was sufficient to demonstrate his judging experience.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the evidence of the Petitioner's adjudicator role was sufficient to demonstrate his judging experience.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=21335
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the requisite level of expertise.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the requisite level of expertise.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=21340
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

artistic display

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that evidence of the Petitioner's orchestral performances was sufficient to meet the plain language of this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that evidence of the Petitioner's orchestral performances was sufficient to meet the plain language of this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=21337
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO finds petitioner has not demonstrated a record of success or progress, citation impact, or interest from relevant parties sufficient to show she is well positioned to advance her ASD research endeavor. Much of the evidence (publications, presentations, peer review invitations, advisory work, teaching assistantships) post-dates the filing date and cannot establish eligibility at filing.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds petitioner has not demonstrated a record of success or progress, citation impact, or interest from relevant parties sufficient to show she is well positioned to advance her ASD research endeavor. Much of the evidence (publications, presentations, peer review invitations, advisory work, teaching assistantships) post-dates the filing date and cannot establish eligibility at filing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-02_01_B5203; source_row=21331
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer/labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO concludes petitioner has not shown an urgent national interest in her own efforts or that her contributions would benefit the nation even if qualified U.S. workers were available; her shortage-of-qualified-workers argument actually undermines the claim that obtaining a labor certification would be impractical.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concludes petitioner has not shown an urgent national interest in her own efforts or that her contributions would benefit the nation even if qualified U.S. workers were available; her shortage-of-qualified-workers argument actually undermines the claim that obtaining a labor certification would be impractical.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-02_01_B5203; source_row=21332
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

证据为何得到认可

AAO finds petitioner's proposed ASD-related work has substantial merit. While teaching activities lack documented broader impact and do not meet national importance, her proposed ASD education research is of national importance because results are disseminated through journals and conferences.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds petitioner's proposed ASD-related work has substantial merit. While teaching activities lack documented broader impact and do not meet national importance, her proposed ASD education research is of national importance because results are disseminated through journals and conferences.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-02_01_B5203; source_row=21330
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评