可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 17131–17140

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

ability to pay combined proffered wages

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record showed ability to pay in 2015 for this individual petition's proffered wage, but not the combined proffered wages of at least 18 other pending I-140 petitions filed since the priority date. The record lacked information on the other petitions' priority dates, proffered wages, and current status.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record showed ability to pay in 2015 for this individual petition's proffered wage, but not the combined proffered wages of at least 18 other pending I-140 petitions filed since the priority date. The record lacked information on the other petitions' priority dates, proffered wages, and current status.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-28_03_B5203; source_row=21227
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程工程师博士

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer and labor certification

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the waiver warranted because the Beneficiary's unique qualifications and innovative problem-solving cannot be easily articulated in a standard labor certification, and because his work benefits the U.S. broadly, extending beyond any one employer, even if other qualified U.S. workers were available.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the waiver warranted because the Beneficiary's unique qualifications and innovative problem-solving cannot be easily articulated in a standard labor certification, and because his work benefits the U.S. broadly, extending beyond any one employer, even if other qualified U.S. workers were available.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-27_01_B5203; source_row=21221
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程工程师博士

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the Beneficiary well positioned based on his leadership of multi-million-dollar federally funded projects, his role in developing innovative clean energy technologies that have been adopted in industry, and sustained government and commercial interest in his work.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Beneficiary well positioned based on his leadership of multi-million-dollar federally funded projects, his role in developing innovative clean energy technologies that have been adopted in industry, and sustained government and commercial interest in his work.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-27_01_B5203; source_row=21220
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程工程师博士

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the proposed research has substantial merit because it aims to advance scientific knowledge and further economic and environmental interests, and is of national importance because it supports U.S. energy security and has potential to replace fossil fuels at scale.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the proposed research has substantial merit because it aims to advance scientific knowledge and further economic and environmental interests, and is of national importance because it supports U.S. energy security and has potential to replace fossil fuels at scale.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-27_01_B5203; source_row=21219
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner claims he performed a leading or critical role as a 'professional officer' following his internship, but provided only his own affidavit with no documentary evidence that he ever entered on duty in that position, and no documentation showing how the role fit within the organizational hierarchy or demonstrated critical impact.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner claims he performed a leading or critical role as a 'professional officer' following his internship, but provided only his own affidavit with no documentary evidence that he ever entered on duty in that position, and no documentation showing how the role fit within the organizational hierarchy or demonstrated critical impact.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-24_01_B2203; source_row=21215
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

5 years post-baccalaureate experience

证据为何得到认可

The official academic record (result sheet) shows the Beneficiary completed the postgraduate diploma requirements on July 1, 2009; experience accrues from degree completion, not diploma issuance, so the 5-year requirement is satisfied.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The official academic record (result sheet) shows the Beneficiary completed the postgraduate diploma requirements on July 1, 2009; experience accrues from degree completion, not diploma issuance, so the 5-year requirement is satisfied.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-24_01_B5203; source_row=21217
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

labor certification supports advanced degree professional classification

AAO 为什么未被说服

The labor certification's alternate requirements in H.8-B and H.14 are inconsistent and ambiguous; some readings would not require an advanced degree professional. Remand is needed to develop the record.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification's alternate requirements in H.8-B and H.14 are inconsistent and ambiguous; some readings would not require an advanced degree professional. Remand is needed to develop the record.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-24_01_B5203; source_row=21218
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations / comparable evidence

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner argues his staff position constitutes comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4), but he provided no evidence verifying his position on the staff and no explanation of how a staff position would be considered a leading or critical role.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner argues his staff position constitutes comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4), but he provided no evidence verifying his position on the staff and no explanation of how a staff position would be considered a leading or critical role.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-24_01_B2203; source_row=21216
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO has previously concluded the Petitioner satisfies the judging criterion and reaffirms this finding.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO has previously concluded the Petitioner satisfies the judging criterion and reaffirms this finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-24_01_B2203; source_row=21214
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

数学 / 统计

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that obtaining a labor certification would be impractical, noting that the Department of Labor addresses worker shortages through that process. AAO further noted the employer's prior debarment period had ended before the petition was filed, and even if it had not, it would not establish the waiver's benefit to the United States.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that obtaining a labor certification would be impractical, noting that the Department of Labor addresses worker shortages through that process. AAO further noted the employer's prior debarment period had ended before the petition was filed, and even if it had not, it would not establish the waiver's benefit to the United States.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-23_01_B5203; source_row=21211
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评