可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 17171–17180

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Beneficiary was paid $138,788.93 in 2015, below the $150,000 minimum. Net income and net current assets were both negative. Equity funding did not cure the actual shortfall. The 2014 payment predated the priority date, and 2016 payroll records are not regulatory-required evidence. Sonegawa factors did not help given the Petitioner's consistent unprofitability and going-concern doubt.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Beneficiary was paid $138,788.93 in 2015, below the $150,000 minimum. Net income and net current assets were both negative. Equity funding did not cure the actual shortfall. The 2014 payment predated the priority date, and 2016 payroll records are not regulatory-required evidence. Sonegawa factors did not help given the Petitioner's consistent unprofitability and going-concern doubt.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-10_01_B5203; source_row=21180
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

bona fides of job opportunity

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO analyzed all Modular Container factors and found several weighed against bona fides: the Beneficiary's role as president spanning 2010–2015, managerial CTO duties, ownership interest potentially up to 9.2%, specialized job requirements, and small workforce. Unresolved inconsistencies about presidential role and lack of recruitment documentation also undermined bona fides.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO analyzed all Modular Container factors and found several weighed against bona fides: the Beneficiary's role as president spanning 2010–2015, managerial CTO duties, ownership interest potentially up to 9.2%, specialized job requirements, and small workforce. Unresolved inconsistencies about presidential role and lack of recruitment documentation also undermined bona fides.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-10_01_B5203; source_row=21181
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Labor certification supports advanced degree professional classification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that the H.14 'in lieu of' language exceeds standard Kellogg language and creates an undefined minimum that could fall below a master's degree or its regulatory equivalent. Without recruitment documentation to clarify intent, the labor certification cannot support advanced degree professional classification.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the H.14 'in lieu of' language exceeds standard Kellogg language and creates an undefined minimum that could fall below a master's degree or its regulatory equivalent. Without recruitment documentation to clarify intent, the labor certification cannot support advanced degree professional classification.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-10_02_B5203; source_row=21183
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Continuing ability to pay proffered wage

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that W-2 Forms showing actual payment of the full proffered wage in 2014 and 2015, together with documented wages and net current assets in 2013, established ability to pay for this Beneficiary and all other sponsored I-140 beneficiaries.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that W-2 Forms showing actual payment of the full proffered wage in 2014 and 2015, together with documented wages and net current assets in 2013, established ability to pay for this Beneficiary and all other sponsored I-140 beneficiaries.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-09_02_B5203; source_row=21177
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary qualifications as of priority date

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the Beneficiary possessed all education, training, and experience required by the labor certification as of the priority date of November 27, 2013.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Beneficiary possessed all education, training, and experience required by the labor certification as of the priority date of November 27, 2013.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-09_02_B5203; source_row=21178
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

beneficiary qualifications as of priority date

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the Beneficiary possessed all required education, training, and experience specified in the labor certification as of the priority date of May 10, 2013.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Beneficiary possessed all required education, training, and experience specified in the labor certification as of the priority date of May 10, 2013.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-09_01_B5203; source_row=21176
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wage

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the Petitioner's submission of required documentary evidence, actual wage payments in 2015, and net current assets in 2013–2014 demonstrated ability to pay the proffered wage across all relevant years.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's submission of required documentary evidence, actual wage payments in 2015, and net current assets in 2013–2014 demonstrated ability to pay the proffered wage across all relevant years.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-09_01_B5203; source_row=21175
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

经济学

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary holds qualifying degree per labor certification

证据为何得到认可

AAO reviewed the full record including appeal evidence and determined the Beneficiary holds the foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's degree in economics, satisfying the labor certification's sole educational requirement.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reviewed the full record including appeal evidence and determined the Beneficiary holds the foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's degree in economics, satisfying the labor certification's sole educational requirement.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-09_03_B5203; source_row=21179
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他2,005 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO declined to conduct a full Kazarian step-2 analysis since the Petitioner failed step 1, but noted that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the required level of expertise.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a full Kazarian step-2 analysis since the Petitioner failed step 1, but noted that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the required level of expertise.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-08_01_B2203; source_row=21165
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他2,005 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The documentation submitted was insufficient to demonstrate that the award is a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence in fashion design. The rector's letter did not comment about the award, the article only mentioned it in passing without discussing its significance, and the online profile of another designer referencing the award did not establish its national or international recognition.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The documentation submitted was insufficient to demonstrate that the award is a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence in fashion design. The rector's letter did not comment about the award, the article only mentioned it in passing without discussing its significance, and the online profile of another designer referencing the award did not establish its national or international recognition.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-08_01_B2203; source_row=21159
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评