AAO determined that the totality of the evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim. Press coverage was largely about former modeling work, the single qualifying acting article predated the filing by five years, judging was in fashion/talent contests rather than among professional actors, movie premieres were at undistinguished venues, and box office earnings were not shown to be remarkable compa…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO determined that the totality of the evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim. Press coverage was largely about former modeling work, the single qualifying acting article predated the filing by five years, judging was in fashion/talent contests rather than among professional actors, movie premieres were at undistinguished venues, and box office earnings were not shown to be remarkable compared to the industry.
AAO found the Petitioner's occupation is not a listed profession and she did not show a baccalaureate is the minimum entry requirement; additionally, she failed to submit the required academic credential evaluation for her foreign degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's occupation is not a listed profession and she did not show a baccalaureate is the minimum entry requirement; additionally, she failed to submit the required academic credential evaluation for her foreign degree.
Criteria B through E (various exceptional ability criteria)
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner's motion did not include new evidence to overcome prior findings that she offered insufficient documentation to meet criteria B through E.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's motion did not include new evidence to overcome prior findings that she offered insufficient documentation to meet criteria B through E.
AAO previously determined in the July 2, 2014 appellate decision that the Petitioner's degrees satisfied this criterion and did not revisit that finding.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO previously determined in the July 2, 2014 appellate decision that the Petitioner's degrees satisfied this criterion and did not revisit that finding.
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions by peers, governmental entities, or professional/business organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
The reference letters, presentation slides, and speaking engagement were insufficient to document recognition for achievements and significant contributions. Additionally, the speaking engagement post-dated the petition filing date and thus could not establish eligibility at the time of filing; one reference letter was unsigned and of limited evidentiary value.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The reference letters, presentation slides, and speaking engagement were insufficient to document recognition for achievements and significant contributions. Additionally, the speaking engagement post-dated the petition filing date and thus could not establish eligibility at the time of filing; one reference letter was unsigned and of limited evidentiary value.
AAO found that the Petitioner demonstrated it more likely than not has had the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date up to the present.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner demonstrated it more likely than not has had the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date up to the present.
Beneficiary meets labor certification educational and experience requirements
证据为何得到认可
AAO concluded on de novo review that the Beneficiary had all the education, training, and experience specified on the ETA Form 9089 as of the priority date.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded on de novo review that the Beneficiary had all the education, training, and experience specified on the ETA Form 9089 as of the priority date.
AAO concurred with the Director that an article discussing the Petitioner's acting career meets the plain language of the published material criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concurred with the Director that an article discussing the Petitioner's acting career meets the plain language of the published material criterion.