Continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from priority date
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner paid only $62,400 of the $71,300 proffered wage in 2015, and its 2015 tax return showed a net loss of $45,635 and net current liabilities of $18,543. Totality-of-circumstances factors from Sonegawa were unavailing; group-entity income could not be attributed to the corporate petitioner; arguments about 2016 payments did not satisfy the continuing obligation from the 2015 priority date; personal-service-corpor…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner paid only $62,400 of the $71,300 proffered wage in 2015, and its 2015 tax return showed a net loss of $45,635 and net current liabilities of $18,543. Totality-of-circumstances factors from Sonegawa were unavailing; group-entity income could not be attributed to the corporate petitioner; arguments about 2016 payments did not satisfy the continuing obligation from the 2015 priority date; personal-service-corporation characterization was inapplicable; and shareholders did not demonstrate willingness or ability to forgo officer compensation.
AAO found the letter sufficiently demonstrated that the Petitioner judged the work of others in an allied field, satisfying the plain language of the criterion.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the letter sufficiently demonstrated that the Petitioner judged the work of others in an allied field, satisfying the plain language of the criterion.
The Petitioner participated in only some of the group's albums, did not provide record sales data or box office receipts, and did not offer persuasive reasoning for attributing the group's commercial success to herself individually.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner participated in only some of the group's albums, did not provide record sales data or box office receipts, and did not offer persuasive reasoning for attributing the group's commercial success to herself individually.
The Petitioner failed to show that the associations require outstanding achievements as an essential condition for membership. One organization's website stated it is open to everybody, and another's membership applied to clubs rather than individuals.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner failed to show that the associations require outstanding achievements as an essential condition for membership. One organization's website stated it is open to everybody, and another's membership applied to clubs rather than individuals.
Several articles lacked the required author attribution; some articles were not about the Petitioner but merely mentioned him among other participants; and the one article that was about the Petitioner appeared to be from a locally distributed newsletter that did not qualify as professional or major trade publication or major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Several articles lacked the required author attribution; some articles were not about the Petitioner but merely mentioned him among other participants; and the one article that was about the Petitioner appeared to be from a locally distributed newsletter that did not qualify as professional or major trade publication or major media.
The Petitioner did not show how his role as a competitor constituted a leading role, did not indicate where his position fit in the organization's hierarchy, and did not demonstrate that his successes impacted the organization's standing. Additionally, the record was insufficient to establish that the organization enjoys a distinguished reputation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not show how his role as a competitor constituted a leading role, did not indicate where his position fit in the organization's hierarchy, and did not demonstrate that his successes impacted the organization's standing. Additionally, the record was insufficient to establish that the organization enjoys a distinguished reputation.
The Petitioner did not demonstrate that his prizes or awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. Background information about awarding entities was insufficient without documentation showing the awards' national or international recognition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not demonstrate that his prizes or awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. Background information about awarding entities was insufficient without documentation showing the awards' national or international recognition.
advanced degree / foreign equivalent education required by labor certification
证据为何得到认可
AAO accepted the new accreditation evidence and withdrew its prior appellate finding that the university's accreditation at the time of graduation was unestablished.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO accepted the new accreditation evidence and withdrew its prior appellate finding that the university's accreditation at the time of graduation was unestablished.
continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from priority date
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO rejected housing payments as proof of ability to pay because the Petitioner did not show DOL had audited the benefit or that the benefit is not common to comparable jobs. AAO found numerous unresolved inconsistencies among compensation checks, original and corrected Forms W-2, and tax returns, and credited only the compensation checks.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO rejected housing payments as proof of ability to pay because the Petitioner did not show DOL had audited the benefit or that the benefit is not common to comparable jobs. AAO found numerous unresolved inconsistencies among compensation checks, original and corrected Forms W-2, and tax returns, and credited only the compensation checks. Net current assets could not be calculated from the tax returns, and the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances factors did not favor the Petitioner.