published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO affirmed the denial, finding that translated articles were missing required author and date information, that some claimed authors conflicted with bylines on the articles, and that the Petitioner had not demonstrated the publications constituted major media with significant national or international distribution.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed the denial, finding that translated articles were missing required author and date information, that some claimed authors conflicted with bylines on the articles, and that the Petitioner had not demonstrated the publications constituted major media with significant national or international distribution.
AAO agreed with the Director that the regulation does not allow any alternative measure of commercial success other than box office receipts or record/cassette/CD/video sales, and the submitted evidence did not meet the plain language of this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the regulation does not allow any alternative measure of commercial success other than box office receipts or record/cassette/CD/video sales, and the submitted evidence did not meet the plain language of this criterion.
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of at least three criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support the required level of expertise.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of at least three criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support the required level of expertise.
AAO independently raises ability to pay 'beyond the decision of the Director' and finds the Petitioner cannot demonstrate ability to pay the aggregate proffered wages of all sponsored beneficiaries; Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances factors do not save the petition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO independently raises ability to pay 'beyond the decision of the Director' and finds the Petitioner cannot demonstrate ability to pay the aggregate proffered wages of all sponsored beneficiaries; Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances factors do not save the petition.
valid labor certification supporting the job offer
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO concludes the LC was certified for the Texas headquarters location based on a Texas labor market test and prevailing wage determination, and the Petitioner no longer maintains a Texas office; the headquarters relocation cannot be accommodated under the LC or the Farmer Memorandum.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concludes the LC was certified for the Texas headquarters location based on a Texas labor market test and prevailing wage determination, and the Petitioner no longer maintains a Texas office; the headquarters relocation cannot be accommodated under the LC or the Farmer Memorandum.
AAO found that the cited court decisions were not relevant to the immigrant visa classification and none established that a P.E. license constitutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence. The P.E. license demonstrates occupational proficiency but not the required recognition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the cited court decisions were not relevant to the immigrant visa classification and none established that a P.E. license constitutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence. The P.E. license demonstrates occupational proficiency but not the required recognition.
AAO found that the petitioner did not establish the impact of the flood prediction model beyond the local area, noting no evidence of wide application, extensive citation, or major significance in the field. The self-published book was published after the petition filing date and in any event lacked supporting evidence of major significance in civil engineering.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the petitioner did not establish the impact of the flood prediction model beyond the local area, noting no evidence of wide application, extensive citation, or major significance in the field. The self-published book was published after the petition filing date and in any event lacked supporting evidence of major significance in civil engineering.
AAO reaffirmed that the plain language of the criterion requires published material 'about the alien.' The submitted articles were about students working on flood prediction models, with the petitioner only mentioned in a photograph caption in one article. New Wikipedia circulation data did not elevate the newspaper to major media, nor did it cure the lack of coverage about the petitioner.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reaffirmed that the plain language of the criterion requires published material 'about the alien.' The submitted articles were about students working on flood prediction models, with the petitioner only mentioned in a photograph caption in one article. New Wikipedia circulation data did not elevate the newspaper to major media, nor did it cure the lack of coverage about the petitioner.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
The cited court decisions related to prior litigation and did not address the society's admission requirements. Without evidence that the organization requires outstanding achievements of its members as judged by recognized national or international experts, the criterion is not met.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The cited court decisions related to prior litigation and did not address the society's admission requirements. Without evidence that the organization requires outstanding achievements of its members as judged by recognized national or international experts, the criterion is not met.