可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 17311–17320

NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程硕士

审查的问题

other

Academic degree requirement (job offer) — 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A)

证据为何得到认可

The labor certification allows a diploma, certificate, or similar award from a college or university equivalent to a bachelor's degree, satisfying this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification allows a diploma, certificate, or similar award from a college or university equivalent to a bachelor's degree, satisfying this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-25_01_B5203; source_row=21036
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程硕士

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

License or certification — 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C)

证据为何得到认可

The Beneficiary is certified by the state Education Department to teach chemistry in grades 7-12, satisfying the license or certification criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Beneficiary is certified by the state Education Department to teach chemistry in grades 7-12, satisfying the license or certification criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-25_01_B5203; source_row=21042
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程硕士

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

Academic degree — 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A)

证据为何得到认可

The record demonstrates that the Beneficiary has a degree, diploma, certificate, or similar award from a college or university, satisfying this criterion despite questions about degree duration.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record demonstrates that the Beneficiary has a degree, diploma, certificate, or similar award from a college or university, satisfying this criterion despite questions about degree duration.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-25_01_B5203; source_row=21041
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, but noted in aggregate the record does not support the level of expertise required.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, but noted in aggregate the record does not support the level of expertise required.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=21035
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation

证据为何得到认可

The Petitioner worked for a polo team with a distinguished reputation based on its competitive successes, and evidence including a letter from the team manager showed he performed a critical role by training horses that could withstand competitive pressure, as evidenced by the team's numerous wins.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner worked for a polo team with a distinguished reputation based on its competitive successes, and evidence including a letter from the team manager showed he performed a critical role by training horses that could withstand competitive pressure, as evidenced by the team's numerous wins.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=21032
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

A single citation used as background, conclusory letters that do not explain how the work influenced the field, and speculation about future significance fail to establish major significance at the time of filing.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
A single citation used as background, conclusory letters that do not explain how the work influenced the field, and speculation about future significance fail to establish major significance at the time of filing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-23_01_B2203; source_row=21019
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO observed in the alternative that the aggregate record does not establish that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO observed in the alternative that the aggregate record does not establish that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-23_01_B2203; source_row=21026
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

The letters do not place the vice-chair role in the organizational hierarchy or show responsibility for the institution's success, and the record fails to establish that the institution has a distinguished reputation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters do not place the vice-chair role in the organizational hierarchy or show responsibility for the institution's success, and the record fails to establish that the institution has a distinguished reputation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-23_01_B2203; source_row=21021
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the Petitioner authored a published article in a professional publication and meets the scholarly articles criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner authored a published article in a professional publication and meets the scholarly articles criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-23_01_B2203; source_row=21020
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO concurred with the Director that service on a peer review committee satisfies the judging criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concurred with the Director that service on a peer review committee satisfies the judging criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-23_01_B2203; source_row=21018
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评