可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 17501–17510

NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

材料科学博士

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the record establishes the Petitioner's research is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the record establishes the Petitioner's research is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-31_02_B5203; source_row=20829
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

National in scope

证据为何得到认可

The record supports the Director's finding that the Petitioner meets the second prong of the NYSDOT national interest analysis.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record supports the Director's finding that the Petitioner meets the second prong of the NYSDOT national interest analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-31_01_B5203; source_row=20827
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

Substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

The AAO found that providing news coverage to a widespread audience has substantial intrinsic merit and withdrew the Director's contrary finding.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that providing news coverage to a widespread audience has substantial intrinsic merit and withdrew the Director's contrary finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-31_01_B5203; source_row=20826
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWten years experience未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

ten years experience

At least ten years of full-time experience

AAO 为什么未被说服

The submitted letters do not reflect 10 years of experience, both jobs commenced after the petition was filed, and eligibility must be established at the time of filing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted letters do not reflect 10 years of experience, both jobs commenced after the petition was filed, and eligibility must be established at the time of filing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-31_01_B5203; source_row=20821
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWlicense or certification未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

license or certification

License or certification for the profession or occupation

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not provide evidence of credentials; the submitted emails were sent after the petition's filing date, do not mention the Petitioner by name, and do not constitute a license or professional certification.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not provide evidence of credentials; the submitted emails were sent after the petition's filing date, do not mention the Petitioner by name, and do not constitute a license or professional certification.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-31_01_B5203; source_row=20822
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

National interest served to substantially greater degree than U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not submit letters of support or documentary evidence showing his work as a journalist or political editor influenced the field as a whole, and he did not establish a past record of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not submit letters of support or documentary evidence showing his work as a journalist or political editor influenced the field as a whole, and he did not establish a past record of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-31_01_B5203; source_row=20828
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWrecognition未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

recognition

Recognition for achievements and significant contributions by peers, governmental entities, or professional/business organizations

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not provide any evidence of recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not provide any evidence of recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-31_01_B5203; source_row=20825
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWacademic record未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

academic record

Official academic record relating to area of exceptional ability

AAO 为什么未被说服

While the Petitioner submitted a BA in sociology, he did not provide an official academic record showing the degree relates to journalism, the field for which he seeks classification.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
While the Petitioner submitted a BA in sociology, he did not provide an official academic record showing the degree relates to journalism, the field for which he seeks classification.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-31_01_B5203; source_row=20820
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance in the field

AAO 为什么未被说服

The reference letters were largely conclusory and did not explain how the Petitioner's work substantially impacted the field, influenced other artists, or rose to the level of original contributions of major significance. Work valuable to an employer does not meet the standard of major significance in the field at large.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The reference letters were largely conclusory and did not explain how the Petitioner's work substantially impacted the field, influenced other artists, or rose to the level of original contributions of major significance. Work valuable to an employer does not meet the standard of major significance in the field at large.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-27_01_B2203; source_row=20812
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

The membership requirements listed for the association did not rise to the level of 'outstanding achievements.' The online information submitted on appeal did not mention membership requirements. The record lacked evidence that members' achievements are judged by recognized national or international experts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The membership requirements listed for the association did not rise to the level of 'outstanding achievements.' The online information submitted on appeal did not mention membership requirements. The record lacked evidence that members' achievements are judged by recognized national or international experts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-27_01_B2203; source_row=20810
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评