可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 17621–17630

EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他教授

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership

AAO 为什么未被说服

The letter from the association's former president did not address membership requirements, and the Petitioner herself acknowledged the association does not require outstanding achievements. As for the fellowship, the certificate was dated after the appeal was filed, eligibility must be established at the time of filing, and the Petitioner failed to submit membership requirements or bylaws.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The letter from the association's former president did not address membership requirements, and the Petitioner herself acknowledged the association does not require outstanding achievements. As for the fellowship, the certificate was dated after the appeal was filed, eligibility must be established at the time of filing, and the Petitioner failed to submit membership requirements or bylaws.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=20699
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他教授

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The letter from the association president offered historical background and eligibility criteria for the merit badge but did not demonstrate that the award is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field as required by the regulation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The letter from the association president offered historical background and eligibility criteria for the merit badge but did not demonstrate that the award is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field as required by the regulation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=20698
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他教授

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

The ranking document submitted by the Petitioner did not identify its source or confirm the claimed rankings. The association's journal was not shown to be highly ranked, and the Petitioner did not otherwise establish that the organization has a distinguished reputation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The ranking document submitted by the Petitioner did not identify its source or confirm the claimed rankings. The association's journal was not shown to be highly ranked, and the Petitioner did not otherwise establish that the organization has a distinguished reputation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=20702
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他教授

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The record documented the Petitioner's authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications, confirming the Director's finding.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record documented the Petitioner's authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications, confirming the Director's finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=20701
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他教授

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the new evidence submitted on appeal — documentation of peer review of scholarly articles for professional journals — was sufficient to establish that the Petitioner participated in judging the work of others.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the new evidence submitted on appeal — documentation of peer review of scholarly articles for professional journals — was sufficient to establish that the Petitioner participated in judging the work of others.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=20700
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他教授

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the aggregate record does not support a finding of extraordinary ability.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the aggregate record does not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=20703
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

数学 / 统计

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

Working in multiple geographic jurisdictions does not make an individual classroom teacher's work national in scope; her work does not significantly contribute to national educational goals at a nationally significant level, consistent with NYSDOT's example of an elementary school teacher.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Working in multiple geographic jurisdictions does not make an individual classroom teacher's work national in scope; her work does not significantly contribute to national educational goals at a nationally significant level, consistent with NYSDOT's example of an elementary school teacher.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-20_01_B5203; source_row=20695
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

数学 / 统计

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

national interest served to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

The recommendation letters indicate she is a well-liked and conscientious teacher with a lengthy career but do not claim she has had an impact on the field of teaching as a whole, and the materials do not set her apart from other competent and qualified teachers.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The recommendation letters indicate she is a well-liked and conscientious teacher with a lengthy career but do not claim she has had an impact on the field of teaching as a whole, and the materials do not set her apart from other competent and qualified teachers.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-20_01_B5203; source_row=20696
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

数学 / 统计

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree or equivalent qualification

证据为何得到认可

AAO found sufficient documentation in the record to overcome the Director's finding, even though the Petitioner did not contest it on appeal.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found sufficient documentation in the record to overcome the Director's finding, even though the Petitioner did not contest it on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-20_01_B5203; source_row=20697
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

数学 / 统计

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO confirmed the Petitioner's work as a teacher is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit and that she holds an advanced degree.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO confirmed the Petitioner's work as a teacher is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit and that she holds an advanced degree.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-20_01_B5203; source_row=20694
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评