可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 17711780

NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree or equivalent

证据为何得到认可

AACRAO's EDGE database confirms the Brazilian título de cirurgião dentista is the foreign equivalent of a U.S. first professional degree in dentistry, satisfying the advanced degree requirement. A previously overlooked course evaluation report in the record supported this conclusion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AACRAO's EDGE database confirms the Brazilian título de cirurgião dentista is the foreign equivalent of a U.S. first professional degree in dentistry, satisfying the advanced degree requirement. A previously overlooked course evaluation report in the record supported this conclusion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-07_01_B5203; source_row=42546
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach prong three because prong one was dispositive against the Petitioner.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach prong three because prong one was dispositive against the Petitioner.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-07_01_B5203; source_row=42549
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他博士后14 篇论文14 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agrees the certificate lacks specific, detailed information (no names, paper titles, or dates) and the mentor letters use identical, vague language. AAO does not reach the Director's signature-credibility concern.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees the certificate lacks specific, detailed information (no names, paper titles, or dates) and the mentor letters use identical, vague language. AAO does not reach the Director's signature-credibility concern.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-07_01_B2203; source_row=42541
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他博士后14 篇论文14 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations

裁决如何说明

Petitioner did not contest this criterion on appeal; AAO deems it waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner did not contest this criterion on appeal; AAO deems it waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-07_01_B2203; source_row=42540
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他博士后14 篇论文14 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO reserves the final merits determination but observes the record in aggregate would not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field status.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserves the final merits determination but observes the record in aggregate would not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field status.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-07_01_B2203; source_row=42545
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他博士后14 篇论文14 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO accepts the Director's finding that this criterion is met; not contested on appeal.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO accepts the Director's finding that this criterion is met; not contested on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-07_01_B2203; source_row=42543
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他博士后14 篇论文14 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

裁决如何说明

Petitioner did not challenge the Director's finding on this criterion on appeal; AAO deems it waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner did not challenge the Director's finding on this criterion on appeal; AAO deems it waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-07_01_B2203; source_row=42539
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the record did support substantial merit given the importance of the financial managers field, but agreed that national importance was not established. The Petitioner did not show that her work would result in broader implications beyond immediate benefits to her employers or customers, failed to explain how her use of emerging technologies would impact the industry at a national level, and lacked evidence of…

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the record did support substantial merit given the importance of the financial managers field, but agreed that national importance was not established. The Petitioner did not show that her work would result in broader implications beyond immediate benefits to her employers or customers, failed to explain how her use of emerging technologies would impact the industry at a national level, and lacked evidence of projected employment or substantial economic effects attributable to her specific endeavor.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-06_04_B5203; source_row=42536
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree qualification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO withdrew the Director's finding because physical therapy customarily requires a DPT degree, and the regulation expressly prohibits substituting education-plus-experience when a doctoral degree is customarily required. The Petitioner's credential evaluation showed only a bachelor's-level 'Licentiate in Physical Therapy,' not a DPT equivalent.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because physical therapy customarily requires a DPT degree, and the regulation expressly prohibits substituting education-plus-experience when a doctoral degree is customarily required. The Petitioner's credential evaluation showed only a bachelor's-level 'Licentiate in Physical Therapy,' not a DPT equivalent.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-06_02_B5203; source_row=42532
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision on national importance, agreeing that the Petitioner's initial proposed endeavor of working as a physical therapist specialist was not shown to be nationally important, and that the post-filing home care company claims cannot be considered.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision on national importance, agreeing that the Petitioner's initial proposed endeavor of working as a physical therapist specialist was not shown to be nationally important, and that the post-filing home care company claims cannot be considered.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-06_02_B5203; source_row=42533
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评