可追溯来源的裁决研究
从大量个案裁决理由中检索，再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。
本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录，而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误；标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率，也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。
10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定
当前显示 17801–17810
案件事实
审查的问题
national in scope
证据为何得到认可
AAO agrees the proposed benefit will be national in scope.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
AAO agrees the proposed benefit will be national in scope.
案件事实
审查的问题
serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agrees with the Director that the Petitioner has not demonstrated influence on the field as a whole. Reference letters and project documentation lack specific examples of impact, and online availability of curriculum materials does not by itself show widespread use or influence. Volunteering and unique skills do not establish the required influence.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
AAO agrees with the Director that the Petitioner has not demonstrated influence on the field as a whole. Reference letters and project documentation lack specific examples of impact, and online availability of curriculum materials does not by itself show widespread use or influence. Volunteering and unique skills do not establish the required influence.
案件事实
审查的问题
substantial intrinsic merit
证据为何得到认可
AAO agrees that the Petitioner's work in microbiology/food safety is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
AAO agrees that the Petitioner's work in microbiology/food safety is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
案件事实
审查的问题
original contributions of major significance
AAO 为什么未被说服
The reference letters focused on specific project successes without demonstrating impact on the field as a whole, praised skills and traits without tying them to original contributions of major significance, and repeated regulatory language without explaining how the contributions influenced the field. Having a diverse skill set is not itself a contribution of major significance.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
The reference letters focused on specific project successes without demonstrating impact on the field as a whole, praised skills and traits without tying them to original contributions of major significance, and repeated regulatory language without explaining how the contributions influenced the field. Having a diverse skill set is not itself a contribution of major significance.
案件事实
审查的问题
awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner's documentation showed only that a project was presented at a conference; there was no evidence she received the claimed award or that it is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in her field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The Petitioner's documentation showed only that a project was presented at a conference; there was no evidence she received the claimed award or that it is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in her field.
案件事实
审查的问题
published material
AAO 为什么未被说服
The material must be about the petitioner and published in professional or major trade publications or other major media. Submission of the Petitioner's own artistic work does not satisfy the criterion, and self-authored documents do not constitute published material about the Petitioner. Additionally, certain documents lacked required English translations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The material must be about the petitioner and published in professional or major trade publications or other major media. Submission of the Petitioner's own artistic work does not satisfy the criterion, and self-authored documents do not constitute published material about the Petitioner. Additionally, certain documents lacked required English translations.
案件事实
审查的问题
final merits determination
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO stated it need not conduct a formal final merits determination given failure at step 1, but noted the aggregate record does not support a finding that the Petitioner has established the required level of expertise.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO stated it need not conduct a formal final merits determination given failure at step 1, but noted the aggregate record does not support a finding that the Petitioner has established the required level of expertise.
案件事实
审查的问题
high salary
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner's salary was at the high national average but below the high California regional average where she resides. Her earnings did not establish a high salary in relation to others in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The Petitioner's salary was at the high national average but below the high California regional average where she resides. Her earnings did not establish a high salary in relation to others in the field.
案件事实
审查的问题
artistic display
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed the Petitioner's documentation of her work exhibited at conferences and at a showcase in Italy supported a finding that this criterion was met.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO agreed the Petitioner's documentation of her work exhibited at conferences and at a showcase in Italy supported a finding that this criterion was met.
案件事实
审查的问题
Wages paid to the Beneficiary
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Form W-2 for 2008 shows the Petitioner paid the Beneficiary only $62,114.16, less than the $65,000 proffered wage, so the Petitioner could not rely on the full-wage-paid exception and was required to demonstrate ability to pay combined proffered wages for all pending petitions.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The Form W-2 for 2008 shows the Petitioner paid the Beneficiary only $62,114.16, less than the $65,000 proffered wage, so the Petitioner could not rely on the full-wage-paid exception and was required to demonstrate ability to pay combined proffered wages for all pending petitions.