可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 17901–17910

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

数学 / 统计

审查的问题

other

five years of progressive qualifying experience

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the unresolved inconsistency between the employer letters and the Form G-325A casts doubt on the claimed experience, and counsel's surmise of a typographical error is not evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the unresolved inconsistency between the employer letters and the Form G-325A casts doubt on the claimed experience, and counsel's surmise of a typographical error is not evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-20_01_B5203; source_row=20411
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the individual

证据为何得到认可

Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner met the published material criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner met the published material criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-20_01_B2203; source_row=20406
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria at step one, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support the required level of expertise.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria at step one, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support the required level of expertise.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-20_01_B2203; source_row=20409
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他硕士

审查的问题

other

Ability to Pay Proffered Wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner's 2014 chart contained material errors inflating net current assets' coverage, the 2015 projections were unsupported and inconsistent, and the totality-of-circumstances analysis did not apply due to insufficient evidence of business growth and industry standing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's 2014 chart contained material errors inflating net current assets' coverage, the 2015 projections were unsupported and inconsistent, and the totality-of-circumstances analysis did not apply due to insufficient evidence of business growth and industry standing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-20_02_B5203; source_row=20416
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他硕士

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary's Academic Qualifications

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO upheld the Director's reliance on EDGE, finding the submitted credential evaluation lacked analytical support (no comparison of coursework or credit hours), and confirmed that the Beneficiary's Indian credentials equate to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a master's.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO upheld the Director's reliance on EDGE, finding the submitted credential evaluation lacked analytical support (no comparison of coursework or credit hours), and confirmed that the Beneficiary's Indian credentials equate to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a master's.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-20_02_B5203; source_row=20414
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他硕士

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary's Employment Experience

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO confirmed that qualifying experience must be post-baccalaureate, meaning only work after April 28, 2007 could count, yielding approximately 2.5 years—far short of the required 5 years. Moreover, the experience letters were internally inconsistent with the Beneficiary's own labor certification job descriptions, making the evidence unreliable regardless of duration.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO confirmed that qualifying experience must be post-baccalaureate, meaning only work after April 28, 2007 could count, yielding approximately 2.5 years—far short of the required 5 years. Moreover, the experience letters were internally inconsistent with the Beneficiary's own labor certification job descriptions, making the evidence unreliable regardless of duration.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-20_02_B5203; source_row=20415
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

物理

审查的问题

other

Position requires individual of exceptional ability

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO agreed that the labor certification's education and experience requirements, entry-level wage, and job duties do not demonstrate the position requires exceptional ability. The bare statement on the labor certification is conclusory, the dual credit program requirements are not sufficiently rigorous, and the offered salary (10% above entry-level, below the area median) does not indicate exceptional ability.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed that the labor certification's education and experience requirements, entry-level wage, and job duties do not demonstrate the position requires exceptional ability. The bare statement on the labor certification is conclusory, the dual credit program requirements are not sufficiently rigorous, and the offered salary (10% above entry-level, below the area median) does not indicate exceptional ability.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-17_02_B5203; source_row=20404
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足

案件事实

社会科学30 次引用11 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found that the evidence in the aggregate did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. Published material spanned only five months, peer review was limited to one journal of unestablished prestige, citation history was minimal and improperly documented, reference letters were conclusory, and conference presentations lacked objective evidence of prestige or selective criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the evidence in the aggregate did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. Published material spanned only five months, peer review was limited to one journal of unestablished prestige, citation history was minimal and improperly documented, reference letters were conclusory, and conference presentations lacked objective evidence of prestige or selective criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-13_01_B2203; source_row=20392
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者未满足

案件事实

社会科学30 次引用11 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found that the Petitioner did not submit copies of the original Chinese-language articles, and that the translations provided were uncertified and did not accompany the original articles. Without properly certified translations and the original articles, the evidence could not be evaluated.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the Petitioner did not submit copies of the original Chinese-language articles, and that the translations provided were uncertified and did not accompany the original articles. Without properly certified translations and the original articles, the evidence could not be evaluated.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-13_01_B2203; source_row=20391
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

foreign equivalent degree above a baccalaureate

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that the Beneficiary's Filipino BSPT is not a foreign equivalent degree above a baccalaureate. The credentialing organization's coursework-aggregation methodology, including post-graduation coursework, is not the same as identifying a single foreign equivalent advanced degree, and EDGE—a reliable source—equates the Filipino BSPT to a U.S. baccalaureate.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Beneficiary's Filipino BSPT is not a foreign equivalent degree above a baccalaureate. The credentialing organization's coursework-aggregation methodology, including post-graduation coursework, is not the same as identifying a single foreign equivalent advanced degree, and EDGE—a reliable source—equates the Filipino BSPT to a U.S. baccalaureate.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-13_05_B5203; source_row=20402
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评