可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 17991–18000

NIWexceptional ability other申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

original scientific or scholarly research contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

The petitioner did not address this criterion on appeal and has therefore abandoned any claims regarding it.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not address this criterion on appeal and has therefore abandoned any claims regarding it.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-05-14_01_B5203; source_row=17958
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

labor certification establishes position requires advanced degree professional

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO affirmed, holding that the plain language of Part H.14 permits a combination of lesser degrees and that AAO may not ignore terms of the labor certification. The recruitment documentation was inconclusive as it did not specify the nature of the bachelor's-degree equivalency.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed, holding that the plain language of Part H.14 permits a combination of lesser degrees and that AAO may not ignore terms of the labor certification. The recruitment documentation was inconclusive as it did not specify the nature of the bachelor's-degree equivalency.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-12_01_B5203; source_row=20314
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

beneficiary's possession of qualifying experience by priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found two employer letters deficient under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) for failing to describe the Beneficiary's experience, and rejected the coworker affidavit as secondary evidence because the petitioner did not establish the unavailability of the required primary evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found two employer letters deficient under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) for failing to describe the Beneficiary's experience, and rejected the coworker affidavit as secondary evidence because the petitioner did not establish the unavailability of the required primary evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-12_01_B5203; source_row=20315
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the awards lack context demonstrating national or international recognition or that they were given for excellence in dance or choreography.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the awards lack context demonstrating national or international recognition or that they were given for excellence in dance or choreography.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-09_01_B2203; source_row=20307
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding the troupe relationship was employment rather than association membership and that the union membership lacked evidence that outstanding achievements are required as judged by recognized national or international experts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding the troupe relationship was employment rather than association membership and that the union membership lacked evidence that outstanding achievements are required as judged by recognized national or international experts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-09_01_B2203; source_row=20308
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner provided no copies of the underlying articles, did not show they were unavailable, did not establish the articles were about him personally rather than about the troupe, and did not show the publications constituted major media.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner provided no copies of the underlying articles, did not show they were unavailable, did not establish the articles were about him personally rather than about the troupe, and did not show the publications constituted major media.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-09_01_B2203; source_row=20309
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO acknowledged the troupe had a distinguished reputation but found the documentation insufficient to corroborate that Petitioner's role was leading or critical, with conclusory letters lacking context regarding hierarchy, duties, or impact.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO acknowledged the troupe had a distinguished reputation but found the documentation insufficient to corroborate that Petitioner's role was leading or critical, with conclusory letters lacking context regarding hierarchy, duties, or impact.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-09_01_B2203; source_row=20311
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 商业成功未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 商业成功

commercial successes in the performing arts

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found no box office receipts or corroborating evidence of tour dates or ticket sales, and no evidence linking commercial success to the Petitioner's specific participation or prominence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found no box office receipts or corroborating evidence of tour dates or ticket sales, and no evidence linking commercial success to the Petitioner's specific participation or prominence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-09_01_B2203; source_row=20312
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of the individual's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed Petitioner provided sufficient evidence of his work being displayed at artistic exhibitions through posters and brochures of his performances.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed Petitioner provided sufficient evidence of his work being displayed at artistic exhibitions through posters and brochures of his performances.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-09_01_B2203; source_row=20310
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1Aother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

intent to continue work in area of extraordinary ability

AAO 为什么未被说服

Petitioner left Form I-140 Part 6 blank, did not respond to the RFE on intended employment, and never identified the role he intended to fill in the U.S.; the record suggests he has shifted from dancer to choreographer/instructor, which AAO treats as different areas of expertise.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner left Form I-140 Part 6 blank, did not respond to the RFE on intended employment, and never identified the role he intended to fill in the U.S.; the record suggests he has shifted from dancer to choreographer/instructor, which AAO treats as different areas of expertise.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-09_01_B2203; source_row=20313
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评