可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 18021–18030

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

other

ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner's 2014 net income ($52,205) was insufficient to cover combined proffered wages of $69,660 for the Beneficiary and Mr. F-. Net current assets were negative in both 2013 and 2014. The argument that Mr. A-'s former wages could be redirected failed because there was no evidence the Beneficiary was replacing Mr. A- or that their positions involved the same duties.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's 2014 net income ($52,205) was insufficient to cover combined proffered wages of $69,660 for the Beneficiary and Mr. F-. Net current assets were negative in both 2013 and 2014. The argument that Mr. A-'s former wages could be redirected failed because there was no evidence the Beneficiary was replacing Mr. A- or that their positions involved the same duties. The totality of circumstances—declining gross receipts, declining wages paid, and consistently negative net current assets—confirmed inability to pay.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-22_01_B5203; source_row=20281
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学博士

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

The appellate documents and letter from a co-principal investigator adequately demonstrated that the Petitioner's proposed research endeavors—comparative studies on faculty creativity in Nigeria and the U.S.—have substantial intrinsic merit. The Director's determination was withdrawn.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The appellate documents and letter from a co-principal investigator adequately demonstrated that the Petitioner's proposed research endeavors—comparative studies on faculty creativity in Nigeria and the U.S.—have substantial intrinsic merit. The Director's determination was withdrawn.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-22_07_B5203; source_row=20288
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学博士

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

证据为何得到认可

The submitted documentation showed that the proposed benefit from the Petitioner's complexity leadership research has national and international breadth, as results are disseminated through conferences and journals. The Director's determination was withdrawn.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted documentation showed that the proposed benefit from the Petitioner's complexity leadership research has national and international breadth, as results are disseminated through conferences and journals. The Director's determination was withdrawn.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-22_07_B5203; source_row=20289
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

petitioner's intent to permanently employ beneficiary per terms of labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that although the record showed continued operations, it lacked independent objective evidence of the Petitioner's intention to permanently employ the Beneficiary, given the parent company's stated two-year operational plan, the lease expiring in May 2016, and the HR manager's letter indicating the Petitioner would cease as an independent entity.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that although the record showed continued operations, it lacked independent objective evidence of the Petitioner's intention to permanently employ the Beneficiary, given the parent company's stated two-year operational plan, the lease expiring in May 2016, and the HR manager's letter indicating the Petitioner would cease as an independent entity.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-22_02_B5203; source_row=20282
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree or foreign equivalent

证据为何得到认可

Citing EDGE, AAO found that an Indian three-year MCA is comparable to a U.S. master's degree, and the Beneficiary's MCA therefore qualifies as a foreign equivalent advanced degree.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Citing EDGE, AAO found that an Indian three-year MCA is comparable to a U.S. master's degree, and the Beneficiary's MCA therefore qualifies as a foreign equivalent advanced degree.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-22_05_B5203; source_row=20283
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

degree in field of study specified on labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO held that even assuming arguendo that an Indian MCA equates to a U.S. master's in applied computer science, that field is not among the four specified in box H.4-B and the Petitioner answered 'No' to alternate fields of study; recruitment evidence did not put U.S. workers on notice that a computer applications/applied computer science degree was acceptable.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held that even assuming arguendo that an Indian MCA equates to a U.S. master's in applied computer science, that field is not among the four specified in box H.4-B and the Petitioner answered 'No' to alternate fields of study; recruitment evidence did not put U.S. workers on notice that a computer applications/applied computer science degree was acceptable.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-22_05_B5203; source_row=20284
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the totality of evidence, including extensive publications, favorable citations, peer review, invited moderator roles, critical transplantation roles, and expert attestations, established sustained national and international acclaim at the very top of the field of cardiothoracic surgery.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the totality of evidence, including extensive publications, favorable citations, peer review, invited moderator roles, critical transplantation roles, and expert attestations, established sustained national and international acclaim at the very top of the field of cardiothoracic surgery.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-20_01_B2203; source_row=20276
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that criterion (vi) was met, noting the record supports this finding.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that criterion (vi) was met, noting the record supports this finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-20_01_B2203; source_row=20274
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that criterion (viii) was met, noting the record supports this finding.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that criterion (viii) was met, noting the record supports this finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-20_01_B2203; source_row=20275
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that criterion (iv) was met, noting the record supports this finding.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that criterion (iv) was met, noting the record supports this finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-20_01_B2203; source_row=20273
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评