AAO found that the Petitioner's eight-year national team membership, multiple top-three international competition finishes worth hundreds of IJF ranking points, expert letters from Olympic gold medalists, and major news coverage together establish sustained national and international acclaim and that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the top of the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's eight-year national team membership, multiple top-three international competition finishes worth hundreds of IJF ranking points, expert letters from Olympic gold medalists, and major news coverage together establish sustained national and international acclaim and that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the top of the field.
continuing work in area of extraordinary ability (athlete-to-coach transition)
证据为何得到认可
AAO found that the Petitioner's recent competitive acclaim (competing through late 2013, filing in May 2014), immediate transition to national-level coaching, formal coaching education (bachelor's and master's in physical education), and Class 1 and Class 2 judo coaching licenses collectively establish that coaching is within his area of expertise.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's recent competitive acclaim (competing through late 2013, filing in May 2014), immediate transition to national-level coaching, formal coaching education (bachelor's and master's in physical education), and Class 1 and Class 2 judo coaching licenses collectively establish that coaching is within his area of expertise.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
证据为何得到认可
The record reflects that the Petitioner won first place in two recognized competitions, qualifying as lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record reflects that the Petitioner won first place in two recognized competitions, qualifying as lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that membership on the Korean national judo team constitutes an association membership requiring outstanding achievements as judged by national experts in judo, satisfying this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that membership on the Korean national judo team constitutes an association membership requiring outstanding achievements as judged by national experts in judo, satisfying this criterion.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
证据为何得到认可
AAO took administrative notice that Yonhap News Agency is Korea's largest news organization with extensive domestic and international reach, qualifying the Seoul Yonhap News article as published in major media about the Petitioner.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO took administrative notice that Yonhap News Agency is Korea's largest news organization with extensive domestic and international reach, qualifying the Seoul Yonhap News article as published in major media about the Petitioner.
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that his proposed benefits would be national in scope. His seizure freedom score tool was not shown to be used or considered outside his institution, and journal publications and conference presentations did not establish national impact.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that his proposed benefits would be national in scope. His seizure freedom score tool was not shown to be used or considered outside his institution, and journal publications and conference presentations did not establish national impact.
national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not demonstrate that he would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker with the same minimum qualifications. His evidence showed he is a talented and well-regarded physician but did not show influence on the field as a whole.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not demonstrate that he would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker with the same minimum qualifications. His evidence showed he is a talented and well-regarded physician but did not show influence on the field as a whole.
Discrepancy between number of employees and visa petitions
证据为何得到认可
AAO found that USCIS records, when properly analyzed, showed no material discrepancy between the Petitioner's stated employment of 31 people and its H-1B and I-140 filings; W-2 evidence showed payments to the vast majority of beneficiaries.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that USCIS records, when properly analyzed, showed no material discrepancy between the Petitioner's stated employment of 31 people and its H-1B and I-140 filings; W-2 evidence showed payments to the vast majority of beneficiaries.