可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 18141–18150

NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床硕士

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner's work was confined to a geographic area and her materials did not substantiate that her endeavors resulted in benefits beyond her employers. Being a Schedule A occupation, nursing already has an expedited labor certification process, and the Petitioner did not explain how waiving even that process is nationally beneficial.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's work was confined to a geographic area and her materials did not substantiate that her endeavors resulted in benefits beyond her employers. Being a Schedule A occupation, nursing already has an expedited labor certification process, and the Petitioner did not explain how waiving even that process is nationally beneficial.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-03-01_01_B5203; source_row=20168
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能硕士

审查的问题

other

Foreign equivalent of master's degree

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that the Beneficiary's licenciatura is only equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree per the EDGE database. Combining two licenciatura degrees from different institutions does not create a single foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. master's. None of the credential evaluations submitted adequately addressed EDGE's conclusions or cited peer-reviewed reference materials.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Beneficiary's licenciatura is only equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree per the EDGE database. Combining two licenciatura degrees from different institutions does not create a single foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. master's. None of the credential evaluations submitted adequately addressed EDGE's conclusions or cited peer-reviewed reference materials.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-29_01_B5203; source_row=20156
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能硕士

审查的问题

other

24 months of experience as computer systems analyst

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found this issue beyond the scope of the Director's decision. The adjunct professor experience letter conflicted with the labor certification's listed duties and the claimed 5 hours/week of work. The Portuguese Army letter lacked an address as required by regulation. Even accepting the university experience at face value, it would account for only 137 days of full-time equivalent experience.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found this issue beyond the scope of the Director's decision. The adjunct professor experience letter conflicted with the labor certification's listed duties and the claimed 5 hours/week of work. The Portuguese Army letter lacked an address as required by regulation. Even accepting the university experience at face value, it would account for only 137 days of full-time equivalent experience.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-29_01_B5203; source_row=20157
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the reference letters were largely conclusory and prospective, that the low citation count (four total citations across four papers) was inconsistent with major significance, that the article-view count was insufficiently probative, and that the award designation was not corroborated by primary evidence or criteria details sufficient to show impact.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the reference letters were largely conclusory and prospective, that the low citation count (four total citations across four papers) was inconsistent with major significance, that the article-view count was insufficiently probative, and that the award designation was not corroborated by primary evidence or criteria details sufficient to show impact.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-24_01_B2203; source_row=20152
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that neither the internship role, the doctoral student positions at the university, nor the R&D assistant role at the employer demonstrated a leading or critical role within the overall organizational hierarchy or by impact on the organizations as a whole.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that neither the internship role, the doctoral student positions at the university, nor the R&D assistant role at the employer demonstrated a leading or critical role within the overall organizational hierarchy or by impact on the organizations as a whole.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-24_01_B2203; source_row=20154
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion based on the submitted letter and email evidence.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion based on the submitted letter and email evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-24_01_B2203; source_row=20151
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold step-one requirement of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold step-one requirement of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-24_01_B2203; source_row=20155
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion based on his published journal articles.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion based on his published journal articles.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-24_01_B2203; source_row=20153
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他经理

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

foreign equivalent degree to U.S. master's degree

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that EDGE reliably establishes the Indian master's degree is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The evaluations submitted were prepared for advocacy and are less reliable than EDGE. An unpublished prior AAO decision is not binding or persuasive.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that EDGE reliably establishes the Indian master's degree is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The evaluations submitted were prepared for advocacy and are less reliable than EDGE. An unpublished prior AAO decision is not binding or persuasive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-22_01_B5203; source_row=20148
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他经理

审查的问题

other

meets labor certification education requirement

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the Indian master's degree does not satisfy the labor certification's master's degree requirement because it is not a foreign equivalent to a U.S. master's degree.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Indian master's degree does not satisfy the labor certification's master's degree requirement because it is not a foreign equivalent to a U.S. master's degree.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-22_01_B5203; source_row=20149
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评