Ability to pay proffered wages for other I-140 beneficiaries
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner declined to provide wage information for other I-140 beneficiaries and did not identify them, their priority dates, proffered wages, or current immigration status. This failure to submit requested evidence precluded a material line of inquiry and raised further doubt about whether the job offer to the instant beneficiary was realistic.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner declined to provide wage information for other I-140 beneficiaries and did not identify them, their priority dates, proffered wages, or current immigration status. This failure to submit requested evidence precluded a material line of inquiry and raised further doubt about whether the job offer to the instant beneficiary was realistic.
Ability to pay based on net income or net current assets from tax returns
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner submitted only page 1 of the 2014 Form 1120S on appeal, omitting Schedule K and Schedule L, which are needed to determine net income and net current assets. Without the complete return, no firm conclusion about the Petitioner's financial strength could be drawn. The 2013 return showed a net loss of over $200,000.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted only page 1 of the 2014 Form 1120S on appeal, omitting Schedule K and Schedule L, which are needed to determine net income and net current assets. Without the complete return, no firm conclusion about the Petitioner's financial strength could be drawn. The 2013 return showed a net loss of over $200,000.
Meets minimum educational requirement of labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
Because the beneficiary lacks a master's degree or foreign equivalent, and because the labor certification does not permit an alternate combination of education and experience, and no experience evidence was submitted, the beneficiary does not qualify for the offered position.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the beneficiary lacks a master's degree or foreign equivalent, and because the labor certification does not permit an alternate combination of education and experience, and no experience evidence was submitted, the beneficiary does not qualify for the offered position.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The community service award does not recognize excellence in the field of accounting and auditing, and its applicant pool is limited by nationality and educational background, precluding a finding of national or international recognition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The community service award does not recognize excellence in the field of accounting and auditing, and its applicant pool is limited by nationality and educational background, precluding a finding of national or international recognition.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
The CIA, CPA, and CFE designations are based on examinations, educational credentials, professional background, and personal conduct standards, none of which constitute outstanding achievements judged by nationally or internationally recognized experts as required by the criterion's plain language.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The CIA, CPA, and CFE designations are based on examinations, educational credentials, professional background, and personal conduct standards, none of which constitute outstanding achievements judged by nationally or internationally recognized experts as required by the criterion's plain language.
high salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
Earning above the average or above the 75th percentile is insufficient to show high salary. The available compensation data could not be accurately compared to the Petitioner's total remuneration because it included non-base-salary components. Additionally, post-petition earnings are irrelevant; the Petitioner must rely on his earnings at the time of filing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Earning above the average or above the 75th percentile is insufficient to show high salary. The available compensation data could not be accurately compared to the Petitioner's total remuneration because it included non-base-salary components. Additionally, post-petition earnings are irrelevant; the Petitioner must rely on his earnings at the time of filing.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
裁决如何说明
Because the Petitioner did not specifically address the Director's finding or provide legal support for error, the issue was abandoned on appeal. Additionally, the articles appeared in university-based publications rather than professional or major trade publications or major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the Petitioner did not specifically address the Director's finding or provide legal support for error, the issue was abandoned on appeal. Additionally, the articles appeared in university-based publications rather than professional or major trade publications or major media.
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
证据为何得到认可
The record supports the Director's finding that the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role for a distinguished international organization, having been appointed to organize and develop the Internal Audit capacities of a Ministry of Planning and Finance.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record supports the Director's finding that the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role for a distinguished international organization, having been appointed to organize and develop the Internal Audit capacities of a Ministry of Planning and Finance.
The Petitioner did not specifically address the Director's reasoning or provide legal support on appeal, abandoning the issue. Additionally, participation on a commission investigating a possible embezzlement did not establish that the Petitioner judged the work of others in the same or allied field.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not specifically address the Director's reasoning or provide legal support on appeal, abandoning the issue. Additionally, participation on a commission investigating a possible embezzlement did not establish that the Petitioner judged the work of others in the same or allied field.
original contributions of major significance in the field
裁决如何说明
The issue was abandoned on appeal for failure to provide legal support. Additionally, the record did not demonstrate that the Petitioner's work was original or of major significance to the field as a whole; the impact of the Internal Audit Manual he authored was unconfirmed, and the lack of citations to his thesis undermined the claim.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The issue was abandoned on appeal for failure to provide legal support. Additionally, the record did not demonstrate that the Petitioner's work was original or of major significance to the field as a whole; the impact of the Internal Audit Manual he authored was unconfirmed, and the lack of citations to his thesis undermined the claim.