display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner failed to raise this criterion before the director and instead asserted it on appeal. AAO found the letters submitted only confirmed works were archived, not displayed, and the petitioner provided no evidence that archived items are on public display.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner failed to raise this criterion before the director and instead asserted it on appeal. AAO found the letters submitted only confirmed works were archived, not displayed, and the petitioner provided no evidence that archived items are on public display.
high salary or other significantly high remuneration for services
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner did not raise this criterion before the director, and on appeal only mentioned salary in the context of a final merits determination. There was no comparative salary evidence to establish the beneficiary's compensation was high in relation to others in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not raise this criterion before the director, and on appeal only mentioned salary in the context of a final merits determination. There was no comparative salary evidence to establish the beneficiary's compensation was high in relation to others in the field.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the submitted articles were not about the beneficiary personally, a website biography lacked evidence of qualifying as major media, and the key article from a qualifying major media outlet neither focused on the beneficiary nor listed an author as required by the regulation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the submitted articles were not about the beneficiary personally, a website biography lacked evidence of qualifying as major media, and the key article from a qualifying major media outlet neither focused on the beneficiary nor listed an author as required by the regulation.
The petitioner argued that evidence submitted for the membership criterion also satisfies this criterion, but AAO rejected this, noting the criteria are separate and distinct. AAO found no documentary evidence that the petitioner's athletic activities have affected the field in a major way, widely influenced other runners, or otherwise constitute original contributions of major significance.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner argued that evidence submitted for the membership criterion also satisfies this criterion, but AAO rejected this, noting the criteria are separate and distinct. AAO found no documentary evidence that the petitioner's athletic activities have affected the field in a major way, widely influenced other runners, or otherwise constitute original contributions of major significance.
AAO found that the petitioner's evidence of prizes, Olympic team membership, and published material all dated to 2009 or earlier, with nothing demonstrating sustained acclaim up to the petition's 2014 filing date. Wikipedia content was given little weight. The totality of evidence did not establish the petitioner as among the small percentage at the very top of her field with sustained national or international acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the petitioner's evidence of prizes, Olympic team membership, and published material all dated to 2009 or earlier, with nothing demonstrating sustained acclaim up to the petition's 2014 filing date. Wikipedia content was given little weight. The totality of evidence did not establish the petitioner as among the small percentage at the very top of her field with sustained national or international acclaim.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
裁决如何说明
The petitioner did not contest the director's findings on this criterion on appeal and offered no additional discussion, resulting in abandonment of the claim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not contest the director's findings on this criterion on appeal and offered no additional discussion, resulting in abandonment of the claim.
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner submitted sufficient evidence establishing the beneficiary received nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner submitted sufficient evidence establishing the beneficiary received nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field.
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner submitted sufficient evidence of the beneficiary's leading or critical roles for the petitioner and another organization.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner submitted sufficient evidence of the beneficiary's leading or critical roles for the petitioner and another organization.