可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 18761–18770

EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The petitioner authored a book chapter in a professional publication and an article in a trade publication, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner authored a book chapter in a professional publication and an article in a trade publication, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=19498
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations

裁决如何说明

The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion regarding association membership on appeal, and thus abandoned the issue.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion regarding association membership on appeal, and thus abandoned the issue.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=19494
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the step-1 threshold, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not support the required level of expertise.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the step-1 threshold, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not support the required level of expertise.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=19500
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

The record supports the director's conclusion: the petitioner advised nine MBA candidates on final theses and judged the work of others in an allied field as a professional association member.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record supports the director's conclusion: the petitioner advised nine MBA candidates on final theses and judged the work of others in an allied field as a professional association member.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=19496
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien

裁决如何说明

The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion regarding published material on appeal, and thus abandoned the issue.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion regarding published material on appeal, and thus abandoned the issue.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=19495
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

prizes or awards

裁决如何说明

The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion regarding prizes and awards on appeal, and thus abandoned the issue.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion regarding prizes and awards on appeal, and thus abandoned the issue.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=19493
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

Full-time employer relationship

证据为何得到认可

Upon review of the entire record including materials submitted on appeal, AAO determined the petitioner established it more likely than not will be the beneficiary's full-time employer.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Upon review of the entire record including materials submitted on appeal, AAO determined the petitioner established it more likely than not will be the beneficiary's full-time employer.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-29_01_B5203; source_row=19490
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary qualifications per labor certification

证据为何得到认可

The beneficiary meets the educational and experience requirements of the labor certification as well as the advanced degree professional requirements under the Act.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary meets the educational and experience requirements of the labor certification as well as the advanced degree professional requirements under the Act.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-29_01_B5203; source_row=19492
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

Continuing ability to pay proffered wage

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the petitioner demonstrated continuing ability to pay based on W-2 statements showing gross pay above the proffered wage in 2013 and 2014, along with other financial documentation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner demonstrated continuing ability to pay based on W-2 statements showing gross pay above the proffered wage in 2013 and 2014, along with other financial documentation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-29_01_B5203; source_row=19491
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO stated that a final merits determination was not strictly necessary given failure at step one, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the requisite level of expertise for the classification.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO stated that a final merits determination was not strictly necessary given failure at step one, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the requisite level of expertise for the classification.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-26_01_B2203; source_row=19487
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评