AAO declined to formally conduct a final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to formally conduct a final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed the petitioner met this criterion based on the letter from the television channel's chief editor confirming the channel broadcasted an episode about the petitioner and that the channel reaches more than 220 million households and 55 million viewers weekly in 200 countries.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the petitioner met this criterion based on the letter from the television channel's chief editor confirming the channel broadcasted an episode about the petitioner and that the channel reaches more than 220 million households and 55 million viewers weekly in 200 countries.
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner's single qualifying television appearance, unrecognized competition selections, one-time benefit concert performance, fellowship showing potential rather than top-of-field status, and general performing activities do not cumulatively establish sustained national or international acclaim or that he is among the small percentage at the top of the music field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's single qualifying television appearance, unrecognized competition selections, one-time benefit concert performance, fellowship showing potential rather than top-of-field status, and general performing activities do not cumulatively establish sustained national or international acclaim or that he is among the small percentage at the top of the music field.
AAO explicitly declined to conduct the full final merits determination because the petitioner had not met the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the evidence in aggregate did not support the required level of expertise.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct the full final merits determination because the petitioner had not met the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the evidence in aggregate did not support the required level of expertise.
AAO disagreed with the director's finding. The petitioner's supporting translations lacked compliant certification under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3) and thus had no evidentiary value. The translations that were submitted contained internal inconsistencies (e.g., a 2011 document claiming the petitioner was invited in 2011 to serve on a 2000 committee), and the petitioner failed to submit the foreign language original of a key cer…
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the director's finding. The petitioner's supporting translations lacked compliant certification under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3) and thus had no evidentiary value. The translations that were submitted contained internal inconsistencies (e.g., a 2011 document claiming the petitioner was invited in 2011 to serve on a 2000 committee), and the petitioner failed to submit the foreign language original of a key certificate.
AAO finds the record does not explain how the beneficiary obtained two graduate diplomas in two years while working full-time, and the school was not ACICS-accredited until 2010 although the beneficiary's resume indicates attendance from 2008 to 2010, so the record does not establish a qualifying U.S. MBA from an accredited program.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the record does not explain how the beneficiary obtained two graduate diplomas in two years while working full-time, and the school was not ACICS-accredited until 2010 although the beneficiary's resume indicates attendance from 2008 to 2010, so the record does not establish a qualifying U.S. MBA from an accredited program.
AAO finds inconsistencies (2006 vs. 2002 start date; spouse-signed letter; experience letter post-dating prior employer's dissolution) defeat establishment of the required 10 years of qualifying experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds inconsistencies (2006 vs. 2002 start date; spouse-signed letter; experience letter post-dating prior employer's dissolution) defeat establishment of the required 10 years of qualifying experience.
AAO agrees ability to pay was not established but declines to pro-rate the 2013 proffered wage as the Director did, finding pro-ration unwarranted on this record.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees ability to pay was not established but declines to pro-rate the 2013 proffered wage as the Director did, finding pro-ration unwarranted on this record.