AAO raised ability to pay sua sponte and found the petitioner had not documented its capacity to pay the combined proffered wages to all beneficiaries of its multiple pending I-140 petitions.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO raised ability to pay sua sponte and found the petitioner had not documented its capacity to pay the combined proffered wages to all beneficiaries of its multiple pending I-140 petitions.
five years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO held the regulation requires the degree to be in hand before post-baccalaureate experience can accrue, found the expert evaluation and university letters internally inconsistent and unpersuasive, and concluded the operative date is September 15, 2004.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held the regulation requires the degree to be in hand before post-baccalaureate experience can accrue, found the expert evaluation and university letters internally inconsistent and unpersuasive, and concluded the operative date is September 15, 2004.
AAO agreed that the petitioner submitted sufficient evidence, including published scholarly works in his field, to establish that he meets this criterion.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the petitioner submitted sufficient evidence, including published scholarly works in his field, to establish that he meets this criterion.
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
AAO found that the evidence in the aggregate clearly demonstrates sustained national or international acclaim and that the beneficiary has risen to the very top of his field, noting his position at the #1 ranked endocrinology program, textbook chapters described as the definitive world reference, and expert attestation that very few physicians worldwide match his expertise.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the evidence in the aggregate clearly demonstrates sustained national or international acclaim and that the beneficiary has risen to the very top of his field, noting his position at the #1 ranked endocrinology program, textbook chapters described as the definitive world reference, and expert attestation that very few physicians worldwide match his expertise.
The prior decisions (both director and AAO on appeal) found that the petitioner sought employment in an area of substantial intrinsic merit; this prong was not disputed on motion.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The prior decisions (both director and AAO on appeal) found that the petitioner sought employment in an area of substantial intrinsic merit; this prong was not disputed on motion.