membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO held that peer-reviewer service is not membership in an association and is properly addressed under criterion (iv). The cited requirements (graduate degree or 10 years of experience, three research products, etc.) do not constitute outstanding achievements, and the translations contained material added text not present in the Spanish originals.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held that peer-reviewer service is not membership in an association and is properly addressed under criterion (iv). The cited requirements (graduate degree or 10 years of experience, three research products, etc.) do not constitute outstanding achievements, and the translations contained material added text not present in the Spanish originals.
AAO declined to make a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed step 1, but indicated that an aggregate review would also fail, citing the absence of evidence of acclaim activity after 2012.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to make a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed step 1, but indicated that an aggregate review would also fail, citing the absence of evidence of acclaim activity after 2012.
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the petitioner's role as professor and conference-extension coordinator did not constitute a leading or critical role; her director duties at one university were leading but the regulation's plural 'organizations or establishments' requires more than one distinguished organization, which she did not show.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the petitioner's role as professor and conference-extension coordinator did not constitute a leading or critical role; her director duties at one university were leading but the regulation's plural 'organizations or establishments' requires more than one distinguished organization, which she did not show. AAO also found insufficient evidence that the institute had a distinguished reputation outside the university.
AAO found the comparative salary data inconsistent and unreliable; comparisons limited to one university or to median wages do not establish a high salary in the field. Petitioner did not provide objective evidence comparing her research/consulting fees to others in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the comparative salary data inconsistent and unreliable; comparisons limited to one university or to median wages do not establish a high salary in the field. Petitioner did not provide objective evidence comparing her research/consulting fees to others in the field.
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
AAO found that the record contained sufficient documentary evidence that the beneficiary's work appeared in exhibitions, satisfying the plain language of the regulation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the record contained sufficient documentary evidence that the beneficiary's work appeared in exhibitions, satisfying the plain language of the regulation.
The support letters contain conclusory and unsubstantiated assertions that the beneficiary influenced other designers, but do not identify specific professionals who followed the beneficiary's methods or provide documentary evidence that the beneficiary's work impacted the field as a whole rather than individual clients.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The support letters contain conclusory and unsubstantiated assertions that the beneficiary influenced other designers, but do not identify specific professionals who followed the beneficiary's methods or provide documentary evidence that the beneficiary's work impacted the field as a whole rather than individual clients.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
证据为何得到认可
AAO found the record contained sufficient documentary evidence that the beneficiary performed a critical role as an art director and marketing consultant for organizations with distinguished reputations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the record contained sufficient documentary evidence that the beneficiary performed a critical role as an art director and marketing consultant for organizations with distinguished reputations.