lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner did not provide documentary evidence demonstrating that any of the three identified awards (a Youngsters viola award, a youth lutherie contest award limited to school pupils, and a 4th national lutherie contest second prize) are nationally or internationally recognized. Translations were inadequate or showed the youth competitions were limited in scope.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not provide documentary evidence demonstrating that any of the three identified awards (a Youngsters viola award, a youth lutherie contest award limited to school pupils, and a 4th national lutherie contest second prize) are nationally or internationally recognized. Translations were inadequate or showed the youth competitions were limited in scope.
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
Although the employer enjoys a distinguished reputation, the letters do not assert the petitioner performs in a leading role within the organizational hierarchy and do not describe what impact his work has had on the company such that the role is critical.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the employer enjoys a distinguished reputation, the letters do not assert the petitioner performs in a leading role within the organizational hierarchy and do not describe what impact his work has had on the company such that the role is critical.
beneficiary meets minimum requirements stated on the labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO held that the labor certification at Part H requires a master's degree and does not permit any combination of education and experience, so evaluations relying on bachelor's-plus-five-years cannot establish qualification.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held that the labor certification at Part H requires a master's degree and does not permit any combination of education and experience, so evaluations relying on bachelor's-plus-five-years cannot establish qualification. Additionally, claimed experience as a trainee/volunteer/job-trainee was not certified on the ETA 9089 and did not establish work as an occupational therapist, and even if counted would not amount to five years.
advanced degree (or foreign equivalent) qualification under section 203(b)(2)
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed the beneficiary's degree is a bachelor's degree per EDGE, and rejected counsel's argument that the undergraduate thesis demonstrates an advanced degree. AAO also rejected reliance on California licensing/NBCOT certification as proof of equivalency.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the beneficiary's degree is a bachelor's degree per EDGE, and rejected counsel's argument that the undergraduate thesis demonstrates an advanced degree. AAO also rejected reliance on California licensing/NBCOT certification as proof of equivalency.
The article submitted on appeal is about a competition rather than the petitioner, the certified translation does not include the portion bearing his name, and the translation lacks the publication date and author as required by the regulation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The article submitted on appeal is about a competition rather than the petitioner, the certified translation does not include the portion bearing his name, and the translation lacks the publication date and author as required by the regulation.
The petitioner did not assert eligibility under this criterion before the director and did not contest the director's findings on appeal, so AAO treats any claim as abandoned.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not assert eligibility under this criterion before the director and did not contest the director's findings on appeal, so AAO treats any claim as abandoned.
The EDGE database, which AAO considers a reliable peer-reviewed source, characterizes the Spanish 'Titulo de Ingeniero' earned after five years as comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a master's. The petitioner did not respond to the RFE to reconcile this discrepancy.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The EDGE database, which AAO considers a reliable peer-reviewed source, characterizes the Spanish 'Titulo de Ingeniero' earned after five years as comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a master's. The petitioner did not respond to the RFE to reconcile this discrepancy.
Beneficiary qualifying experience per 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1)
AAO 为什么未被说服
The experience letter failed the regulatory requirement under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) because it did not provide a specific description of duties performed by the alien. The petitioner did not submit a compliant replacement letter after the RFE.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The experience letter failed the regulatory requirement under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) because it did not provide a specific description of duties performed by the alien. The petitioner did not submit a compliant replacement letter after the RFE.
The tax returns do not separate fashion producer salary from partnership income and CEO compensation. The wage comparisons used either general occupational categories not closely matching the petitioner's duties, stale data, or average rather than high-end salary benchmarks, none of which properly demonstrate that the petitioner earned a high salary relative to others performing similar work.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The tax returns do not separate fashion producer salary from partnership income and CEO compensation. The wage comparisons used either general occupational categories not closely matching the petitioner's duties, stale data, or average rather than high-end salary benchmarks, none of which properly demonstrate that the petitioner earned a high salary relative to others performing similar work.
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
AAO 为什么未被说服
There is no documentary evidence showing the petitioner's own work was displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases. Performing marketing responsibilities, scheduling photographers and models, and offering consultations do not meet the elements of this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
There is no documentary evidence showing the petitioner's own work was displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases. Performing marketing responsibilities, scheduling photographers and models, and offering consultations do not meet the elements of this criterion.