The petitioner's awards were earned as a competitive swimmer, not as a coach. Since the field for which classification is sought is coaching, swimming awards do not establish national or international recognition as a coach.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's awards were earned as a competitive swimmer, not as a coach. Since the field for which classification is sought is coaching, swimming awards do not establish national or international recognition as a coach.
The submitted articles lacked properly certified translations meeting the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3) and could not be accorded probative weight. Additionally, the articles related to competitive swimming, not coaching, and there was no circulation evidence showing the publications were major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted articles lacked properly certified translations meeting the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3) and could not be accorded probative weight. Additionally, the articles related to competitive swimming, not coaching, and there was no circulation evidence showing the publications were major media.
The AAO found that the petitioner's earned salary was substantially below average salaries in his professions, his dividend income from his business was not evidence of salary as a writer/speaker/magician, and the average/median salary comparisons did not establish that his earnings were high in relation to others in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the petitioner's earned salary was substantially below average salaries in his professions, his dividend income from his business was not evidence of salary as a writer/speaker/magician, and the average/median salary comparisons did not establish that his earnings were high in relation to others in the field.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found that the letters confirmed the petitioner provided lectures and shows but did not provide specific information establishing a leading or critical role, and that occasional or one-time performances do not rise to the level required by this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the letters confirmed the petitioner provided lectures and shows but did not provide specific information establishing a leading or critical role, and that occasional or one-time performances do not rise to the level required by this criterion.
The AAO upheld the director's interpretation that this criterion is limited to the visual arts, and since the petitioner is not a visual artist and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at artistic exhibitions, the criterion is not met.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO upheld the director's interpretation that this criterion is limited to the visual arts, and since the petitioner is not a visual artist and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at artistic exhibitions, the criterion is not met.
The AAO found that the letters and evidence submitted showed only individual or limited impact rather than major significance in the field as a whole, and that authorship and publication of books and CDs alone is insufficient without evidence of major significance.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the letters and evidence submitted showed only individual or limited impact rather than major significance in the field as a whole, and that authorship and publication of books and CDs alone is insufficient without evidence of major significance.
The AAO found that the petitioner failed to provide compliant full translations, failed to establish that publications qualify as professional or major trade publications or other major media, and failed to include the date and/or author for many articles.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the petitioner failed to provide compliant full translations, failed to establish that publications qualify as professional or major trade publications or other major media, and failed to include the date and/or author for many articles.
The AAO withdrew the director's erroneous interpretation that the criterion requires more than one award, but still concluded the criterion was not met because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that either the [REDACTED] Award or the [REDACTED] awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence beyond the awarding entity.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO withdrew the director's erroneous interpretation that the criterion requires more than one award, but still concluded the criterion was not met because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that either the [REDACTED] Award or the [REDACTED] awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence beyond the awarding entity.
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the petitioner did not satisfy the antecedent requirement of meeting at least three criteria, though AAO noted the aggregate evidence was insufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the petitioner did not satisfy the antecedent requirement of meeting at least three criteria, though AAO noted the aggregate evidence was insufficient.