high salary or significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The director found this criterion met, but AAO reversed. The pay vouchers were in a foreign language without certified translations and thus had no probative value. The submitted salary comparators used mean/average wages rather than wages at the top of the field. Per-event payment structures required comparison with top-of-field per-event earnings that were not supplied.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The director found this criterion met, but AAO reversed. The pay vouchers were in a foreign language without certified translations and thus had no probative value. The submitted salary comparators used mean/average wages rather than wages at the top of the field. Per-event payment structures required comparison with top-of-field per-event earnings that were not supplied. Future film profit projections could not establish remuneration actually commanded as of the filing date.
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The director found this criterion met, but AAO reversed. The article relied upon by the director did not reference the beneficiary, and the contract was dated after the event and only described general promotional activities.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The director found this criterion met, but AAO reversed. The article relied upon by the director did not reference the beneficiary, and the contract was dated after the event and only described general promotional activities. Evidence from other claimed organizations was either untranslated, from individuals rather than organizations, or showed a role for only one organization, whereas the regulation requires evidence of a leading or critical role for organizations in the plural.
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner claimed a promotional video played at basketball games qualified as an artistic exhibition or showcase, but AAO found that a basketball game is not an artistic exhibition or showcase, and the criterion is limited to the visual arts. The beneficiary is not a visual artist and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at artistic exhibitions.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner claimed a promotional video played at basketball games qualified as an artistic exhibition or showcase, but AAO found that a basketball game is not an artistic exhibition or showcase, and the criterion is limited to the visual arts. The beneficiary is not a visual artist and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at artistic exhibitions.
original contributions of major significance in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The submitted letters of recommendation contained bare assertions of acclaim and vague claims without identifying specific contributions or demonstrating how those contributions rose to a level of major significance in the field as a whole. Letters that merely repeat statutory language or make conclusory statements do not meet the petitioner's burden.…
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted letters of recommendation contained bare assertions of acclaim and vague claims without identifying specific contributions or demonstrating how those contributions rose to a level of major significance in the field as a whole. Letters that merely repeat statutory language or make conclusory statements do not meet the petitioner's burden. Contributions to a single film or event with no demonstrable field-wide impact are insufficient.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
Evidence does not specify duties, place petitioner within organizational hierarchies, or demonstrate that the relevant organizations have distinguished reputations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Evidence does not specify duties, place petitioner within organizational hierarchies, or demonstrate that the relevant organizations have distinguished reputations.
Petitioner did not show that the ten criteria do not readily apply to his occupation; the submitted items relate to existing criteria that have already been evaluated and found insufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner did not show that the ten criteria do not readily apply to his occupation; the submitted items relate to existing criteria that have already been evaluated and found insufficient.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
Many submitted articles are not about the petitioner, omit required author/title/date information, or lack circulation evidence demonstrating that the publications qualify as professional or major trade publications or major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Many submitted articles are not about the petitioner, omit required author/title/date information, or lack circulation evidence demonstrating that the publications qualify as professional or major trade publications or major media.
Letters and articles describe petitioner's talent and activities but do not show that his work has substantially influenced the field of music or constitutes original artistic contributions of major significance.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Letters and articles describe petitioner's talent and activities but do not show that his work has substantially influenced the field of music or constitutes original artistic contributions of major significance.