可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 19311–19320

EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that statements from contest organizers/judges did not show recognition beyond those who issued the awards, and there was no documentary evidence corroborating that the awards were nationally or internationally recognized.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that statements from contest organizers/judges did not show recognition beyond those who issued the awards, and there was no documentary evidence corroborating that the awards were nationally or internationally recognized.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_03_B2203; source_row=18907
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO declined to perform a full final merits determination because step 1 was not satisfied, but observed in aggregate that the evidence did not show the required level of expertise.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to perform a full final merits determination because step 1 was not satisfied, but observed in aggregate that the evidence did not show the required level of expertise.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_03_B2203; source_row=18913
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or significantly high remuneration

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence of actual earnings (e.g., tax records) and did not present a proper basis for comparison with others in his field; media designations as 'famous' do not equate to high salary.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence of actual earnings (e.g., tax records) and did not present a proper basis for comparison with others in his field; media designations as 'famous' do not equate to high salary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_03_B2203; source_row=18911
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

Intrinsic merit of the field of business development was not disputed.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Intrinsic merit of the field of business development was not disputed.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_01_B5203; source_row=18900
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

证据为何得到认可

National scope was not disputed.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
National scope was not disputed.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_01_B5203; source_row=18901
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO finds petitioner's training in (rather than authorship of) the Balanced Scorecard does not constitute a contribution comparable to inventing it; the method is already in widespread use; and her unsupported claim of pioneering a new combined approach, plus the new letter from a charity co-founder, do not establish significant impact on the field.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds petitioner's training in (rather than authorship of) the Balanced Scorecard does not constitute a contribution comparable to inventing it; the method is already in widespread use; and her unsupported claim of pioneering a new combined approach, plus the new letter from a charity co-founder, do not establish significant impact on the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_01_B5203; source_row=18902
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO affirmed the director's finding that this criterion was met.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed the director's finding that this criterion was met.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_03_B2203; source_row=18910
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien

证据为何得到认可

AAO had previously determined in the appellate decision that the petitioner met this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO had previously determined in the appellate decision that the petitioner met this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_03_B2203; source_row=18909
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他硕士

审查的问题

other

26 months of qualifying experience required by labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO independently reviewed the experience letters and found them inconsistent with each other, with the ETA Form 9089, with the Form G-325A, and with the IRS Forms 1099; found that internships pursued for educational credit (CPT/Capstone) cannot be counted toward the experience requirement; and found that experience with the petitioner cannot be credited because the position was substantially comparable to the proffered pos…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO independently reviewed the experience letters and found them inconsistent with each other, with the ETA Form 9089, with the Form G-325A, and with the IRS Forms 1099; found that internships pursued for educational credit (CPT/Capstone) cannot be counted toward the experience requirement; and found that experience with the petitioner cannot be credited because the position was substantially comparable to the proffered position.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-24_01_B5203; source_row=18893
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程学士

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Position offered qualifies as advanced degree professional

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO holds that the labor certification's alternate requirements—'Other' education with 4 years of experience, reducible to a bachelor's plus 2 years for the specified fields—fall below the statutory threshold of an advanced degree or a baccalaureate plus five years of progressive specialty experience.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO holds that the labor certification's alternate requirements—'Other' education with 4 years of experience, reducible to a bachelor's plus 2 years for the specified fields—fall below the statutory threshold of an advanced degree or a baccalaureate plus five years of progressive specialty experience.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-23_02_B5203; source_row=18891
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评