Beneficiary meets advanced degree professional requirements
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO concludes the beneficiary has only three years and six months of qualifying specialty experience as an Industrial Engineer/Quantitative Analyst, falling 18 months short of the five years required.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concludes the beneficiary has only three years and six months of qualifying specialty experience as an Industrial Engineer/Quantitative Analyst, falling 18 months short of the five years required. The beneficiary's prior experience owning and operating a stone-products import business does not constitute full-time experience in the specialty because the duties (price forecasting for precious metals, statistical analysis, etc.) were not shown to have been performed there.
beneficiary qualifications per labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO raised this issue sua sponte on de novo review. The labor certification requires a Master's degree in Chemistry, but the record lacked official transcripts to confirm the beneficiary's foreign degree is equivalent to a U.S. Master's degree in Chemistry.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO raised this issue sua sponte on de novo review. The labor certification requires a Master's degree in Chemistry, but the record lacked official transcripts to confirm the beneficiary's foreign degree is equivalent to a U.S. Master's degree in Chemistry.
The petitioner paid the beneficiary less than the proffered wage in both 2012 and 2013. Net income and net current assets for 2012 were insufficient to cover the gap. The 2013 tax return was not submitted; the accountant letter was not an audited statement and referenced only total assets rather than net current assets. Evidence regarding owner salary availability was contradictory and unsupported.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner paid the beneficiary less than the proffered wage in both 2012 and 2013. Net income and net current assets for 2012 were insufficient to cover the gap. The 2013 tax return was not submitted; the accountant letter was not an audited statement and referenced only total assets rather than net current assets. Evidence regarding owner salary availability was contradictory and unsupported. Totality of circumstances did not establish ability to pay.
AAO found this favorable finding less persuasive, observing that the petitioner did not submit a certified translation of the foreign language published material.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found this favorable finding less persuasive, observing that the petitioner did not submit a certified translation of the foreign language published material.
AAO found that the salary evidence is consistent with the beneficiary being among the small percentage at the very top of the field, noting his earnings well exceed prevailing wages in his occupation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the salary evidence is consistent with the beneficiary being among the small percentage at the very top of the field, noting his earnings well exceed prevailing wages in his occupation.
AAO agreed, citing reference letters establishing the beneficiary's leading or critical role as Creative Director and prior roles for a distinguished videogame publisher and developer.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed, citing reference letters establishing the beneficiary's leading or critical role as Creative Director and prior roles for a distinguished videogame publisher and developer.
AAO agreed, citing letters describing the beneficiary's peer reviews and creative oversight, his written critiques of videogames in development, and his service on a design judging panel.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed, citing letters describing the beneficiary's peer reviews and creative oversight, his written critiques of videogames in development, and his service on a design judging panel.
AAO concluded the totality of evidence — leadership roles at distinguished companies, judging, high salary, and innovative credited work on award-winning, commercially successful videogames — establishes the beneficiary is among the small percentage at the very top of the field with sustained acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the totality of evidence — leadership roles at distinguished companies, judging, high salary, and innovative credited work on award-winning, commercially successful videogames — establishes the beneficiary is among the small percentage at the very top of the field with sustained acclaim.
AAO noted that because step one was not satisfied, no final merits determination was required, but stated in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not show the petitioner has achieved the level of expertise required for the classification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted that because step one was not satisfied, no final merits determination was required, but stated in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not show the petitioner has achieved the level of expertise required for the classification.