可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 19311940

NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO adopted the Director's finding, concluding that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate his endeavor as a Sales Manager would have implications beyond the companies and clients he works with to impact the U.S. economy on a nationally important scale. The record lacked a plan or evidence of projected U.S. economic impact or job creation attributable to his future work.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted the Director's finding, concluding that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate his endeavor as a Sales Manager would have implications beyond the companies and clients he works with to impact the U.S. economy on a nationally important scale. The record lacked a plan or evidence of projected U.S. economic impact or job creation attributable to his future work.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-11_07_B5203; source_row=42300
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved its opinion on the third prong because the first prong was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved its opinion on the third prong because the first prong was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-11_03_B5203; source_row=42290
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved its opinion on the second prong because the first prong was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved its opinion on the second prong because the first prong was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-11_03_B5203; source_row=42289
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO concluded the record does not link the Petitioner's media arts credential to general management duties, and education/skills in isolation do not establish well-positioning.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO concluded the record does not link the Petitioner's media arts credential to general management duties, and education/skills in isolation do not establish well-positioning.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-11_02_B5203; source_row=42285
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the field

裁决如何说明

The AAO assumed arguendo that experience was established and rested decision on the Dhanasar prongs.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO assumed arguendo that experience was established and rested decision on the Dhanasar prongs.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-11_02_B5203; source_row=42287
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner's plans primarily highlighted her credentials and work experience rather than the national importance of her endeavor. Her claims of broad economic impact were unsubstantiated, and her services were analogous to teaching—which Dhanasar itself held does not rise to national importance.…

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's plans primarily highlighted her credentials and work experience rather than the national importance of her endeavor. Her claims of broad economic impact were unsubstantiated, and her services were analogous to teaching—which Dhanasar itself held does not rise to national importance. The expert opinion letter addressed industry significance generally without engaging the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor, and the recommendation letters did not address impact beyond her employers and clients.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-10_03_B5203; source_row=42275
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that while the endeavor has substantial merit, the record lacks sufficient evidence that the Petitioner's products have been or will be adopted by the industry at large or will have far-reaching economic or societal implications beyond her immediate clients and collaborators. Claims of national importance were not adequately corroborated.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that while the endeavor has substantial merit, the record lacks sufficient evidence that the Petitioner's products have been or will be adopted by the industry at large or will have far-reaching economic or societal implications beyond her immediate clients and collaborators. Claims of national importance were not adequately corroborated.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-10_01_B5203; source_row=42263
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能11 篇论文

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found recommendation letters lacked specificity about real-world impact; citation metrics (GS, OpenAlex, Clarivate percentiles) did not demonstrate sufficient interest from relevant parties; and the Petitioner failed to document specific future projects, funding, or institutional support for his planned assistant professor research.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found recommendation letters lacked specificity about real-world impact; citation metrics (GS, OpenAlex, Clarivate percentiles) did not demonstrate sufficient interest from relevant parties; and the Petitioner failed to document specific future projects, funding, or institutional support for his planned assistant professor research.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-10_04_B5203; source_row=42279
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The guest passes are not prizes or awards for excellence in music — they relate to events outside the Petitioner's claimed area, and there is no documentary evidence explaining the circumstances of receipt. The competition award issue was waived on appeal for failure to contest the Director's conclusion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The guest passes are not prizes or awards for excellence in music — they relate to events outside the Petitioner's claimed area, and there is no documentary evidence explaining the circumstances of receipt. The competition award issue was waived on appeal for failure to contest the Director's conclusion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-10_02_B2203; source_row=42266
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in professional associations

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO reaffirmed that professional associations are those requiring at least a bachelor's degree for membership, consistent with the regulatory definition of 'profession,' and Petitioner failed to support a contrary interpretation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reaffirmed that professional associations are those requiring at least a bachelor's degree for membership, consistent with the regulatory definition of 'profession,' and Petitioner failed to support a contrary interpretation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-10_02_B5203; source_row=42273
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评