可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 19401–19410

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

minimum educational requirements per labor certification (Bachelor of Engineering)

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO acknowledged AACRAO's equivalency opinion but held that the regulation requires an official college or university record showing a baccalaureate degree was awarded, and because IEI is not a degree-granting institution, the beneficiary cannot be deemed to hold a Bachelor of Engineering degree as required by the labor certification.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO acknowledged AACRAO's equivalency opinion but held that the regulation requires an official college or university record showing a baccalaureate degree was awarded, and because IEI is not a degree-granting institution, the beneficiary cannot be deemed to hold a Bachelor of Engineering degree as required by the labor certification.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-02_01_B5203; source_row=18806
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能硕士

审查的问题

other

12 months of experience in the job offered by priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO raised the qualifying experience issue sua sponte on appeal. The experience letter lacked required duty descriptions and had an inconsistent job title; secondary evidence was inadmissible without proof the primary letter was unavailable; the supervisor affidavit lacked corroboration of the supervisor's employment with the company; and an Indian offer letter contradicted claims of early U.S.-based employment.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO raised the qualifying experience issue sua sponte on appeal. The experience letter lacked required duty descriptions and had an inconsistent job title; secondary evidence was inadmissible without proof the primary letter was unavailable; the supervisor affidavit lacked corroboration of the supervisor's employment with the company; and an Indian offer letter contradicted claims of early U.S.-based employment.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-02_03_B5203; source_row=18808
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他15,000 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

证据为何得到认可

AAO finds the petitioner initiated PPM DOTS models in India and a treatment program in East Timor that were adopted nationally and internationally; reference letters and supporting documentation confirm major significance impact on the field.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the petitioner initiated PPM DOTS models in India and a treatment program in East Timor that were adopted nationally and internationally; reference letters and supporting documentation confirm major significance impact on the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-01_01_B2203; source_row=18801
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他15,000 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

裁决如何说明

AAO declines to reach criterion (viii) because three other criteria are already satisfied, but notes the petitioner's significant role is consistent with national or international acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declines to reach criterion (viii) because three other criteria are already satisfied, but notes the petitioner's significant role is consistent with national or international acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-01_01_B2203; source_row=18803
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他15,000 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the petitioner

裁决如何说明

AAO acknowledges the director's finding but indicates the record more strongly supports criterion (v) instead; AAO does not separately revisit (iii).

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO acknowledges the director's finding but indicates the record more strongly supports criterion (v) instead; AAO does not separately revisit (iii).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-01_01_B2203; source_row=18799
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他15,000 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

裁决如何说明

AAO did not separately analyze criterion (i) because the petitioner satisfied three other criteria, which is sufficient.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately analyze criterion (i) because the petitioner satisfied three other criteria, which is sufficient.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-01_01_B2203; source_row=18798
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他15,000 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agrees the petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees the petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-01_01_B2203; source_row=18802
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他15,000 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

证据为何得到认可

AAO finds the aggregate evidence — including international leadership roles, expert recognition by peers, heavily cited articles, and significant policy impact in tuberculosis control — establishes the petitioner is among the very top of the field with sustained acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the aggregate evidence — including international leadership roles, expert recognition by peers, heavily cited articles, and significant policy impact in tuberculosis control — establishes the petitioner is among the very top of the field with sustained acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-01_01_B2203; source_row=18804
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他15,000 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO agrees the petitioner served as a peer reviewer, magazine editor, and journal advisory board member, satisfying the judging criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees the petitioner served as a peer reviewer, magazine editor, and journal advisory board member, satisfying the judging criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-01_01_B2203; source_row=18800
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the petitioner's workshops and seminars were part of an already-established continuing education program with many other professionals, that being one of over 60 presenters at a conference does not constitute a leading or critical role, and that evidence of the conference postdated the petition filing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the petitioner's workshops and seminars were part of an already-established continuing education program with many other professionals, that being one of over 60 presenters at a conference does not constitute a leading or critical role, and that evidence of the conference postdated the petition filing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-11-28_02_B2203; source_row=18778
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评