serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO concluded the new evidence did not establish that the petitioner's post-graduate employment generated work of significant national impact. The papers cited as 'new research' actually re-analyzed graduate-era data; the former employer's impact was limited (SEC fraud allegation, fewer than ten machines sold); customer relationships and patents not naming the petitioner did not show his individual influence on the field as…
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the new evidence did not establish that the petitioner's post-graduate employment generated work of significant national impact. The papers cited as 'new research' actually re-analyzed graduate-era data; the former employer's impact was limited (SEC fraud allegation, fewer than ten machines sold); customer relationships and patents not naming the petitioner did not show his individual influence on the field as a whole.
national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner's self-described specialty is marketing and sales, and while his work may have benefited his employers, he has not shown he played a significant role in advancing the broader interactive display industry. Claims of confidentiality do not relieve the petitioner of his burden of proof, and the unsigned letters lacked documentary corroboration.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's self-described specialty is marketing and sales, and while his work may have benefited his employers, he has not shown he played a significant role in advancing the broader interactive display industry. Claims of confidentiality do not relieve the petitioner of his burden of proof, and the unsigned letters lacked documentary corroboration.
The petitioner failed to submit corroborating documentary evidence showing that his developed methodology was widely adopted by companies across the United States; company-level statistics did not establish the petitioner's individual role in that adoption.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner failed to submit corroborating documentary evidence showing that his developed methodology was widely adopted by companies across the United States; company-level statistics did not establish the petitioner's individual role in that adoption.