membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
Petitioner failed to submit reliable evidence of membership; the membership certificate misspelled 'Theatre,' she failed to submit the original despite request, supporting letters were inconsistent, and the regulation requires membership in associations (plural).
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner failed to submit reliable evidence of membership; the membership certificate misspelled 'Theatre,' she failed to submit the original despite request, supporting letters were inconsistent, and the regulation requires membership in associations (plural).
Articles lacked URLs, lacked certified translations, lacked circulation evidence; some materials were not about the petitioner; some were published after the filing date.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Articles lacked URLs, lacked certified translations, lacked circulation evidence; some materials were not about the petitioner; some were published after the filing date.
sustained national or international acclaim / very top of field
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed: the awards were limited to younger contestants, lacked national recognition documentation, and the aggregate evidence did not show the petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of her field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed: the awards were limited to younger contestants, lacked national recognition documentation, and the aggregate evidence did not show the petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of her field.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
The 'invited art director' appointment certificate did not specify duties, no organizational chart was provided, and there was no documentary evidence of a distinguished reputation for the institute.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The 'invited art director' appointment certificate did not specify duties, no organizational chart was provided, and there was no documentary evidence of a distinguished reputation for the institute.
The local association award reflected only local recognition; nominations are not prizes or awards; finalist status is not a prize or award; and the one winner certificate lacked evidence of national or international recognition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The local association award reflected only local recognition; nominations are not prizes or awards; finalist status is not a prize or award; and the one winner certificate lacked evidence of national or international recognition.
No documentary evidence showed that directing eight companies rises to major significance; academic achievements are not equivalent to contributions of major significance; no evidence showed the petitioner's published papers were frequently cited or otherwise had major impact on the field.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
No documentary evidence showed that directing eight companies rises to major significance; academic achievements are not equivalent to contributions of major significance; no evidence showed the petitioner's published papers were frequently cited or otherwise had major impact on the field.
Although the petitioner mentioned performing arts activities, she submitted no box office receipts or record/video sales demonstrating commercial successes in the performing arts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the petitioner mentioned performing arts activities, she submitted no box office receipts or record/video sales demonstrating commercial successes in the performing arts.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
No documentary evidence showed that any of the petitioner's eight companies has a distinguished reputation; her service was with a local chapter rather than a national board; her membership role was not shown to be leading or critical; and no documentary evidence showed the associations have distinguished reputations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
No documentary evidence showed that any of the petitioner's eight companies has a distinguished reputation; her service was with a local chapter rather than a national board; her membership role was not shown to be leading or critical; and no documentary evidence showed the associations have distinguished reputations.
Most submissions lacked evidence of major media status, were advertisements rather than independent journalistic reportage, were authored by (not about) the petitioner, were about other subjects, or lacked required title/date/author information. Authored books do not constitute published material about the alien.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Most submissions lacked evidence of major media status, were advertisements rather than independent journalistic reportage, were authored by (not about) the petitioner, were about other subjects, or lacked required title/date/author information. Authored books do not constitute published material about the alien.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
Compliance with a professional ethics code does not equate to outstanding achievements; no documentary evidence showed membership required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts; the supporting letter's claims about the designation were unsubstantiated.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Compliance with a professional ethics code does not equate to outstanding achievements; no documentary evidence showed membership required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts; the supporting letter's claims about the designation were unsubstantiated.