Letters attesting to the petitioner's membership in two professional music associations since 1994 and 2009 satisfy the plain wording of the regulation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Letters attesting to the petitioner's membership in two professional music associations since 1994 and 2009 satisfy the plain wording of the regulation.
serves national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner's letters attested to his skill, originality, and social conscience, but did not establish a past record of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field as a whole. Claims of global influence for his music genre were unsupported by documentary evidence, and the shift to emphasizing teaching was a material change from the original petition.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's letters attested to his skill, originality, and social conscience, but did not establish a past record of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field as a whole. Claims of global influence for his music genre were unsupported by documentary evidence, and the shift to emphasizing teaching was a material change from the original petition.
AAO agreed that touring performances and the widespread availability of the petitioner's recorded work on CD and download platforms is consistent with a finding of national scope.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that touring performances and the widespread availability of the petitioner's recorded work on CD and download platforms is consistent with a finding of national scope.
New employment letters submitted on appeal conflicted with earlier claims and were not accepted because the director had already given the petitioner an opportunity to remedy the deficiency. Letters consistent with prior claims showed only part-time employment, and the earliest claimed employment was less than ten years before filing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
New employment letters submitted on appeal conflicted with earlier claims and were not accepted because the director had already given the petitioner an opportunity to remedy the deficiency. Letters consistent with prior claims showed only part-time employment, and the earliest claimed employment was less than ten years before filing.
The petitioner holds an intermediate degree in Technology and Music relating to composition with electroacoustic aids, satisfying the plain wording of the regulation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner holds an intermediate degree in Technology and Music relating to composition with electroacoustic aids, satisfying the plain wording of the regulation.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
AAO 为什么未被说服
Certificates did not document achievements or significant contributions; government letters postdated the filing date or were prospective rather than commentary on known significance; contracts do not constitute recognition; new certificate on appeal was unsubstantiated.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Certificates did not document achievements or significant contributions; government letters postdated the filing date or were prospective rather than commentary on known significance; contracts do not constitute recognition; new certificate on appeal was unsubstantiated.
Photographs of medals and trophies do not show they were awarded to the beneficiary; the regulation requires documentation of the alien's receipt. Awards listing the beneficiary's name lack certified translations and thus have no probative value. No documentation explaining the national or international reputation of the awards was submitted.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Photographs of medals and trophies do not show they were awarded to the beneficiary; the regulation requires documentation of the alien's receipt. Awards listing the beneficiary's name lack certified translations and thus have no probative value. No documentation explaining the national or international reputation of the awards was submitted.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
The union membership evidence does not show that the association requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts; other documents lacked certified translations; a certificate of participation in a championship does not establish qualifying membership.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The union membership evidence does not show that the association requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts; other documents lacked certified translations; a certificate of participation in a championship does not establish qualifying membership.