display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
AAO 为什么未被说服
The criterion requires display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases, which is limited to the visual arts. Participating in a karate tournament is not the same as a painter's or sculptor's work being displayed in a gallery or museum. This interpretation has been upheld by a federal district court.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The criterion requires display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases, which is limited to the visual arts. Participating in a karate tournament is not the same as a painter's or sculptor's work being displayed in a gallery or museum. This interpretation has been upheld by a federal district court.
Without certified English translations the evidence has no probative value, and the petitioner failed to submit circulation or distribution data for the publications.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Without certified English translations the evidence has no probative value, and the petitioner failed to submit circulation or distribution data for the publications.
Advanced degree or baccalaureate plus five years progressive experience
AAO 为什么未被说服
The beneficiary's only documented post-graduation qualifying experience amounts to approximately nine months (two months and sixteen days with the German employer and six months and twenty-two days with the Connecticut employer).…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary's only documented post-graduation qualifying experience amounts to approximately nine months (two months and sixteen days with the German employer and six months and twenty-two days with the Connecticut employer). Experience gained with the petitioner cannot be used because the labor certification requires experience in the job offered and the petitioner's own position is substantially comparable to the offered position. Overlapping bachelor's degree enrollment dates also cast doubt on the reliability of the record.
60 months experience in the job offered per labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
The beneficiary cannot use experience gained with the petitioner (substantially comparable position) nor experience in an alternate occupation. Remaining documented experience totals roughly nine months, far short of the required 60 months, and is further undermined by date discrepancies in the submitted letters.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary cannot use experience gained with the petitioner (substantially comparable position) nor experience in an alternate occupation. Remaining documented experience totals roughly nine months, far short of the required 60 months, and is further undermined by date discrepancies in the submitted letters.
DOL independently revoked the labor certification, making the petition unsupported by a valid certification. AAO found counsel's arguments did not overcome the director's revocation, and because the labor certification is no longer valid, the petition cannot proceed.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
DOL independently revoked the labor certification, making the petition unsupported by a valid certification. AAO found counsel's arguments did not overcome the director's revocation, and because the labor certification is no longer valid, the petition cannot proceed.
The expert letters described only future or potential impact rather than already-realized contributions of major significance; citation evidence was moderate and did not demonstrate major significance; and conference presentations did not establish impact beyond the conferences themselves. The petitioner failed to show that her work has already significantly impacted the field.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The expert letters described only future or potential impact rather than already-realized contributions of major significance; citation evidence was moderate and did not demonstrate major significance; and conference presentations did not establish impact beyond the conferences themselves. The petitioner failed to show that her work has already significantly impacted the field.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The record does not contain evidence establishing the national or international recognition of the convention at which the awards were given. The translations do not even identify the specific award received, and the prestige of other award recipients does not establish national or international recognition of the petitioner's award.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record does not contain evidence establishing the national or international recognition of the convention at which the awards were given. The translations do not even identify the specific award received, and the prestige of other award recipients does not establish national or international recognition of the petitioner's award.
The petitioner's judging experience lacks evidence that only those at the very top are selected, and her articles lack evidence of the field's response upon dissemination. The aggregate evidence does not distinguish her as one of the small percentage at the very top of the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's judging experience lacks evidence that only those at the very top are selected, and her articles lack evidence of the field's response upon dissemination. The aggregate evidence does not distinguish her as one of the small percentage at the very top of the field.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
An appointment letter to a future position without additional evidence of how the petitioner actually performed in a leading or critical role is insufficient. Additionally, the criterion requires a leading or critical role for more than one organization, and the petitioner could only potentially establish one.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
An appointment letter to a future position without additional evidence of how the petitioner actually performed in a leading or critical role is insufficient. Additionally, the criterion requires a leading or critical role for more than one organization, and the petitioner could only potentially establish one.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found only one qualifying membership: one association's by-laws stated members are experts in relevant specialty duties. The other associations' membership requirements were based on age, education, or experience minimums, not outstanding achievements. Since the criterion requires plural qualifying memberships, a single qualifying membership is insufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found only one qualifying membership: one association's by-laws stated members are experts in relevant specialty duties. The other associations' membership requirements were based on age, education, or experience minimums, not outstanding achievements. Since the criterion requires plural qualifying memberships, a single qualifying membership is insufficient.