可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 19791–19800

EB-1AEB-1A · 商业成功未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 商业成功

commercial successes in the performing arts

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record contained no documentary evidence of box office receipts or sales. Letters were unsworn and could not substitute for primary or secondary evidence. The petitioner did not establish that primary or secondary evidence was unavailable.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record contained no documentary evidence of box office receipts or sales. Letters were unsworn and could not substitute for primary or secondary evidence. The petitioner did not establish that primary or secondary evidence was unavailable.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=18360
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or significantly high remuneration

AAO 为什么未被说服

Petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence of his own salary or remuneration, or of earnings of others in his occupation at the top level. Letters from colleagues lacked sworn affirmation and were insufficient. The article describing him as 'very expensive' came from a publication with no verified independent journalistic standing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence of his own salary or remuneration, or of earnings of others in his occupation at the top level. Letters from colleagues lacked sworn affirmation and were insufficient. The article describing him as 'very expensive' came from a publication with no verified independent journalistic standing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=18359
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO disagreed with the director, finding that criterion (vii) is limited to the visual arts. A music producer's work performed on stage or radio is not 'on display' in the same sense as a painter's or sculptor's work in a gallery.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that criterion (vii) is limited to the visual arts. A music producer's work performed on stage or radio is not 'on display' in the same sense as a painter's or sculptor's work in a gallery.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=18357
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWprocedural or other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

procedural or other

specific identification of erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the appellate statement merely repeated prior claims already considered, failed to address the director's findings on articles, citations, conference presentations, and clinical work, and did not explain why the unmentioned peer review activity should qualify the petitioner.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the appellate statement merely repeated prior claims already considered, failed to address the director's findings on articles, citations, conference presentations, and clinical work, and did not explain why the unmentioned peer review activity should qualify the petitioner.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-25_01_B5203; source_row=18362
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

证据为何得到认可

AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the record contained sufficient documentary evidence, including letters attesting to the leading and/or critical role the petitioner played in producing and arranging award-winning songs in Armenia.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the record contained sufficient documentary evidence, including letters attesting to the leading and/or critical role the petitioner played in producing and arranging award-winning songs in Armenia.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=18358
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the record contained sufficient documentary evidence establishing that the petitioner served as a judge in 2012.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the record contained sufficient documentary evidence establishing that the petitioner served as a judge in 2012.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=18356
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

电子 / 电气工程

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay proffered wage

证据为何得到认可

The AAO independently determined that the petitioner demonstrated continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date to the present.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO independently determined that the petitioner demonstrated continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date to the present.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-20_01_B5203; source_row=18351
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

电子 / 电气工程

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary qualifications per labor certification

证据为何得到认可

On de novo review, the AAO concluded the petitioner established the beneficiary more likely than not had all the required education, training, and experience as of the priority date.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
On de novo review, the AAO concluded the petitioner established the beneficiary more likely than not had all the required education, training, and experience as of the priority date.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-20_01_B5203; source_row=18350
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner paid no wages to the beneficiary, had net income of $45,124 in 2011 and negative net income in 2012, and net current assets of approximately $546,000–$549,000 — all well short of the $1,294,508.80 combined annual obligation. The 2013 data was not provided. Future contract transfer was too speculative, and the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances factors did not support ability to pay.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner paid no wages to the beneficiary, had net income of $45,124 in 2011 and negative net income in 2012, and net current assets of approximately $546,000–$549,000 — all well short of the $1,294,508.80 combined annual obligation. The 2013 data was not provided. Future contract transfer was too speculative, and the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances factors did not support ability to pay.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-20_02_B5203; source_row=18352
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

bona fide and realistic job offer at listed worksite

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner listed a virtual office as its worksite on the labor certification, while the beneficiary would actually be located at a third-party employer's address in a different county and MSA. The petitioner failed to address this discrepancy on appeal, and a possible relocation to South Carolina made the situation worse. There was also no evidence of a genuine permanent employment relationship with the petitioner.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner listed a virtual office as its worksite on the labor certification, while the beneficiary would actually be located at a third-party employer's address in a different county and MSA. The petitioner failed to address this discrepancy on appeal, and a possible relocation to South Carolina made the situation worse. There was also no evidence of a genuine permanent employment relationship with the petitioner.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-20_02_B5203; source_row=18353
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评