可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 19851–19860

NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner's discussion of the national impact of education concerns collective, rather than individual, impact. Her certificates and letters establish only local-level achievement in school districts where she worked, not influence on the field of music education as a whole.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's discussion of the national impact of education concerns collective, rather than individual, impact. Her certificates and letters establish only local-level achievement in school districts where she worked, not influence on the field of music education as a whole.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-01_06_B5203; source_row=18308
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWten years experience未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

ten years experience

ten years of full-time experience

AAO 为什么未被说服

The submitted documentation shows fewer than a dozen recitals over almost 20 years and a few recordings; this intermittent activity does not establish ten years of full-time experience in composing, arranging, and performing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted documentation shows fewer than a dozen recitals over almost 20 years and a few recordings; this intermittent activity does not establish ten years of full-time experience in composing, arranging, and performing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-01_05_B5203; source_row=18302
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO finds the letters contain general praise without verifiable details, the brother-author letter omits the family relationship and provides no supporting evidence, and the record does not establish a past history of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field as a whole.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the letters contain general praise without verifiable details, the brother-author letter omits the family relationship and provides no supporting evidence, and the record does not establish a past history of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field as a whole.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-01_05_B5203; source_row=18300
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

证据为何得到认可

AAO withdraws the director's finding, holding that musical composition, arrangement, and performance are not inherently restricted to a local level and can reach national or global audiences through recordings, tours, and broadcast media.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdraws the director's finding, holding that musical composition, arrangement, and performance are not inherently restricted to a local level and can reach national or global audiences through recordings, tours, and broadcast media.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-01_05_B5203; source_row=18299
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWlicense or certification未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

license or certification

license or certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

Petitioner identified no license or certification that he holds.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner identified no license or certification that he holds.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-01_05_B5203; source_row=18303
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWacademic record已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

academic record

official academic record (degree/diploma)

证据为何得到认可

Translated bachelor's diploma in music (1970) satisfies the criterion; the claimed master's degree was unsupported.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Translated bachelor's diploma in music (1970) satisfies the criterion; the claimed master's degree was unsupported.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-01_05_B5203; source_row=18301
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO notes intrinsic merit of the occupation is not in dispute.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO notes intrinsic merit of the occupation is not in dispute.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-01_05_B5203; source_row=18298
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWrecognition未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

recognition

recognition for achievements and significant contributions

AAO 为什么未被说服

None of the cited items constitute recognition for identifiable achievements or contributions; the consultation and consulate letters were procedural support for nonimmigrant visa petitions, and the peer letters offered only general praise.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
None of the cited items constitute recognition for identifiable achievements or contributions; the consultation and consulate letters were procedural support for nonimmigrant visa petitions, and the peer letters offered only general praise.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-01_05_B5203; source_row=18306
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

证据为何得到认可

There was no dispute regarding the national scope of the benefit from the petitioner's occupation.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
There was no dispute regarding the national scope of the benefit from the petitioner's occupation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-01_01_B5203; source_row=18282
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

There was no dispute regarding the intrinsic merit of the petitioner's occupation as a mining engineer working on rock pile stability.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
There was no dispute regarding the intrinsic merit of the petitioner's occupation as a mining engineer working on rock pile stability.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-01_01_B5203; source_row=18281
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评