可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 19881–19890

EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner did not establish that the venues had a distinguished reputation, as the submitted information was either self-promotional or limited to local media. Even if the venues were distinguished, the petitioner did not establish that his role as a performing musician was 'leading or critical' for those organizations, nor did he differentiate his role from the numerous other jazz acts that performed there.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not establish that the venues had a distinguished reputation, as the submitted information was either self-promotional or limited to local media. Even if the venues were distinguished, the petitioner did not establish that his role as a performing musician was 'leading or critical' for those organizations, nor did he differentiate his role from the numerous other jazz acts that performed there.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-29_02_B2203; source_row=18258
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

Participation as a judge of the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO confirmed that the petitioner's evidence of serving as a judge for the Juno awards and as a music organization juror meets this regulatory criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO confirmed that the petitioner's evidence of serving as a judge for the Juno awards and as a music organization juror meets this regulatory criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-29_02_B2203; source_row=18255
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wage

证据为何得到认可

Considering wages paid to the beneficiary in 2012 and 2013 plus the correct Schedule K net income of $226,780 for 2012, the petitioner demonstrated ability to pay.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Considering wages paid to the beneficiary in 2012 and 2013 plus the correct Schedule K net income of $226,780 for 2012, the petitioner demonstrated ability to pay.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-29_01_B5203; source_row=18248
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

master's degree in architecture (no alternate field) per labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

The labor certification requires a master's in architecture with no alternate field accepted; the beneficiary's degree is in architectural engineering, so the petitioner has not established that the beneficiary is qualified.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification requires a master's in architecture with no alternate field accepted; the beneficiary's degree is in architectural engineering, so the petitioner has not established that the beneficiary is qualified.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-29_01_B5203; source_row=18249
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

California architectural licensure for proffered position

裁决如何说明

AAO directed that on remand the petitioner should provide evidence regarding whether the position requires a California architect's license, and if not, whether U.S. workers were notified during recruitment that unlicensed architects would be accepted.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO directed that on remand the petitioner should provide evidence regarding whether the position requires a California architect's license, and if not, whether U.S. workers were notified during recruitment that unlicensed architects would be accepted.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-29_01_B5203; source_row=18250
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

证据为何得到认可

The AAO found the totality of evidence demonstrates the petitioner's sustained national acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the toxicology field. Key indicators include an unusually large number of citations, media coverage, expert attestations of major significance, and peer review activities.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the totality of evidence demonstrates the petitioner's sustained national acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the toxicology field. Key indicators include an unusually large number of citations, media coverage, expert attestations of major significance, and peer review activities.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=18247
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

证据为何得到认可

The AAO found the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence including expert letters describing original contributions of major significance, independent citation evidence corroborating the experts' statements, and media reports of his findings.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence including expert letters describing original contributions of major significance, independent citation evidence corroborating the experts' statements, and media reports of his findings.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=18245
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The AAO found the director's requirement went beyond the plain language of the regulation, which does not require demonstrated acclaim from article publication. The petitioner satisfied the criterion by submitting evidence of authorship of scholarly articles in professional journals.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the director's requirement went beyond the plain language of the regulation, which does not require demonstrated acclaim from article publication. The petitioner satisfied the criterion by submitting evidence of authorship of scholarly articles in professional journals.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=18246
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

The AAO found the director's requirement went beyond the plain language of the regulation. The petitioner's peer review activities and abstract evaluations satisfy the criterion as written.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the director's requirement went beyond the plain language of the regulation. The petitioner's peer review activities and abstract evaluations satisfy the criterion as written.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=18244
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

经济学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the letters did not identify specific roles, explain the petitioner's position within organizational hierarchy, or provide specific examples of impact. A letter from a Vice President asserting the petitioner performed a leading role was conclusory and lacked description of duties. Evidence of experience must come from current or former employers.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the letters did not identify specific roles, explain the petitioner's position within organizational hierarchy, or provide specific examples of impact. A letter from a Vice President asserting the petitioner performed a leading role was conclusory and lacked description of duties. Evidence of experience must come from current or former employers.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-25_01_B2203; source_row=18231
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评