可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 19951–19960

EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that a coaching certification based on passing practical exams is not a prize or award for excellence. Comparable evidence was not warranted because the petitioner did not demonstrate that awards in the beneficiary's occupation do not exist. The plain language requires more than one nationally or internationally recognized prize or award.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that a coaching certification based on passing practical exams is not a prize or award for excellence. Comparable evidence was not warranted because the petitioner did not demonstrate that awards in the beneficiary's occupation do not exist. The plain language requires more than one nationally or internationally recognized prize or award.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-14_02_B2203; source_row=18167
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

证据为何得到认可

AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the nature of the petitioner's title and notable ranking sufficiently establish that his awards as a chess player are nationally or internationally recognized.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the nature of the petitioner's title and notable ranking sufficiently establish that his awards as a chess player are nationally or internationally recognized.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-14_01_B2203; source_row=18159
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

Final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold requirement of three types of evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold requirement of three types of evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-14_01_B2203; source_row=18166
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

High salary or significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field

裁决如何说明

The petitioner did not raise this issue on appeal, so the claim is deemed abandoned.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not raise this issue on appeal, so the claim is deemed abandoned.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-14_01_B2203; source_row=18164
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

裁决如何说明

Because the petitioner did not contest the director's findings or offer additional arguments on appeal, she abandoned her claims under this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the petitioner did not contest the director's findings or offer additional arguments on appeal, she abandoned her claims under this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-14_03_B2203; source_row=18175
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The petitioner submitted sufficient evidence of authorship of scholarly articles in the field.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner submitted sufficient evidence of authorship of scholarly articles in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-14_03_B2203; source_row=18178
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner did not submit letters from the employer as required, relied on letters with diminished probative value due to similar language, failed to demonstrate a nexus between her patent and the claimed frostbite cream, and only claimed one organization when the regulation requires the plural.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not submit letters from the employer as required, relied on letters with diminished probative value due to similar language, failed to demonstrate a nexus between her patent and the claimed frostbite cream, and only claimed one organization when the regulation requires the plural.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-14_03_B2203; source_row=18179
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

The petitioner submitted sufficient evidence to establish participation as a judge of the work of others.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner submitted sufficient evidence to establish participation as a judge of the work of others.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-14_03_B2203; source_row=18176
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence establishing the beneficiary meets the plain language of this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence establishing the beneficiary meets the plain language of this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-14_02_B2203; source_row=18171
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Offered position qualifies as a professional position requiring at minimum a bachelor's degree

AAO 为什么未被说服

The labor certification's Part H.14 explicitly allowed a bachelor's degree to be obtained through any combination of education, training, or experience, meaning sub-baccalaureate credentials would be accepted. This disqualifies the position from classification as a professional position under the statute.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification's Part H.14 explicitly allowed a bachelor's degree to be obtained through any combination of education, training, or experience, meaning sub-baccalaureate credentials would be accepted. This disqualifies the position from classification as a professional position under the statute.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-11_01_B5203; source_row=18157
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评