AAO does not disturb the director's finding that this criterion is met but provides guidance regarding major media, websites, and press releases for use on remand.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO does not disturb the director's finding that this criterion is met but provides guidance regarding major media, websites, and press releases for use on remand.
possession of advanced degree or foreign equivalent
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the beneficiary's three-year diploma from a vocational institution, obtained in 1994, is equivalent only to vocational or specialized high school completion per AACRAO EDGE. The two credential evaluations were disregarded because they were unsigned, prepared by unnamed individuals, and reached conflicting conclusions. A three-year degree does not qualify as the foreign equivalent of a U.S.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the beneficiary's three-year diploma from a vocational institution, obtained in 1994, is equivalent only to vocational or specialized high school completion per AACRAO EDGE. The two credential evaluations were disregarded because they were unsigned, prepared by unnamed individuals, and reached conflicting conclusions. A three-year degree does not qualify as the foreign equivalent of a U.S. four-year baccalaureate under Matter of Shah.
Bachelor's degree in Electronics as required by labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
For the same reasons the beneficiary fails the advanced degree qualification analysis, the beneficiary also fails to demonstrate possession of a Bachelor's degree in Electronics or its foreign equivalent as required by the labor certification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
For the same reasons the beneficiary fails the advanced degree qualification analysis, the beneficiary also fails to demonstrate possession of a Bachelor's degree in Electronics or its foreign equivalent as required by the labor certification.
60 months of experience in the job offered as required by labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
The experience letters showed overlapping periods of employment, suggesting the beneficiary simultaneously held two full-time positions during his claimed self-employment, undermining the credibility of all submitted experience evidence. The petitioner also did not resolve discrepancies between the employer names on the labor certification and the corporate/tax records.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The experience letters showed overlapping periods of employment, suggesting the beneficiary simultaneously held two full-time positions during his claimed self-employment, undermining the credibility of all submitted experience evidence. The petitioner also did not resolve discrepancies between the employer names on the labor certification and the corporate/tax records.
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
Although the petitioner demonstrated a leading role at the Confucius Institute, neither the institute nor other organizations were shown to have a distinguished reputation. Letters from supporters were conclusory and lacked supporting documentary evidence, and there was no objective documentary evidence of distinguished reputation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the petitioner demonstrated a leading role at the Confucius Institute, neither the institute nor other organizations were shown to have a distinguished reputation. Letters from supporters were conclusory and lacked supporting documentary evidence, and there was no objective documentary evidence of distinguished reputation.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner's role as director of a Confucius Institute does not constitute membership in an association. Additionally, the petitioner did not provide primary documentary evidence (e.g., bylaws) that the organization requires outstanding achievements of its members as judged by recognized experts. Furthermore, the plain language requires membership in multiple associations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's role as director of a Confucius Institute does not constitute membership in an association. Additionally, the petitioner did not provide primary documentary evidence (e.g., bylaws) that the organization requires outstanding achievements of its members as judged by recognized experts. Furthermore, the plain language requires membership in multiple associations.
AAO agreed that the petitioner's 2007 article constituted a scholarly article in a professional publication, but the March 2013 article post-dated the filing and could not be considered. With only one qualifying article at the time of filing, the petitioner failed the plain-language requirement for plural scholarly articles.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the petitioner's 2007 article constituted a scholarly article in a professional publication, but the March 2013 article post-dated the filing and could not be considered. With only one qualifying article at the time of filing, the petitioner failed the plain-language requirement for plural scholarly articles.