可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 20071–20080

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能工程师

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary meets minimum experience requirement by priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

Even crediting the alleged OPT period, the beneficiary's qualifying experience totaled only four years and seven months, five months short of the required five years. The petitioner also failed to provide independent, objective evidence corroborating the OPT employment gap.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Even crediting the alleged OPT period, the beneficiary's qualifying experience totaled only four years and seven months, five months short of the required five years. The petitioner also failed to provide independent, objective evidence corroborating the OPT employment gap.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-03_03_B5203; source_row=18029
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学71 篇论文

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that the petitioner's occupation has substantial intrinsic merit.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the petitioner's occupation has substantial intrinsic merit.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-03_02_B5203; source_row=18026
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学71 篇论文

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO concluded the petitioner failed to demonstrate past achievement with influence on the field as a whole. Witness letters had strikingly similar language suggesting common authorship by the petitioner and lacked corroborating evidence; provisional patents had lapsed and did not name the petitioner; citation evidence was minimal and largely self-citations; and post-filing diagnostic kit work could not retroactively establi…

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the petitioner failed to demonstrate past achievement with influence on the field as a whole. Witness letters had strikingly similar language suggesting common authorship by the petitioner and lacked corroborating evidence; provisional patents had lapsed and did not name the petitioner; citation evidence was minimal and largely self-citations; and post-filing diagnostic kit work could not retroactively establish eligibility.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-03_02_B5203; source_row=18028
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学71 篇论文

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that the petitioner's work results in benefit that is national in scope.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the petitioner's work results in benefit that is national in scope.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-03_02_B5203; source_row=18027
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能硕士

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary meets educational requirements of labor certification

证据为何得到认可

The record reflects the beneficiary possesses a Master's degree in Electrical Engineering awarded December 19, 2007, satisfying the educational requirements of the labor certification.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record reflects the beneficiary possesses a Master's degree in Electrical Engineering awarded December 19, 2007, satisfying the educational requirements of the labor certification.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-03_01_B5203; source_row=18025
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO affirms because petitioner failed to submit circulation evidence in response to the RFE and did not explain the director's purported error.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirms because petitioner failed to submit circulation evidence in response to the RFE and did not explain the director's purported error.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-02_01_B2203; source_row=18019
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO deems the issue abandoned for failure to address the director's analysis.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO deems the issue abandoned for failure to address the director's analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-02_01_B2203; source_row=18020
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or significantly high remuneration

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO deems the issue abandoned because the petitioner did not address the deficiencies the director identified.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO deems the issue abandoned because the petitioner did not address the deficiencies the director identified.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-02_01_B2203; source_row=18022
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO deems the issue abandoned because the petitioner only repeats prior claims without addressing the director's analysis.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO deems the issue abandoned because the petitioner only repeats prior claims without addressing the director's analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-02_01_B2203; source_row=18018
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1Aother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

intent to continue work in area of expertise

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO finds the petitioner did not provide sufficient detail or clear evidence of plans to continue work in the U.S., citing Matter of Soffici for the principle that going on record without supporting documentary evidence is insufficient.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the petitioner did not provide sufficient detail or clear evidence of plans to continue work in the U.S., citing Matter of Soffici for the principle that going on record without supporting documentary evidence is insufficient.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-02_01_B2203; source_row=18023
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评