可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 20371–20380

NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

serve national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO affirms; the record lacks evidence of citations to the article or comparable indicia of influence, and the ability to secure grant funding does not differentiate the petitioner from other capable researchers or show influence on the field.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirms; the record lacks evidence of citations to the article or comparable indicia of influence, and the ability to secure grant funding does not differentiate the petitioner from other capable researchers or show influence on the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-19_01_B5203; source_row=17693
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO does not disturb the director's finding that the field has substantial intrinsic merit.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO does not disturb the director's finding that the field has substantial intrinsic merit.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-19_01_B5203; source_row=17691
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO affirms that the petitioner has not shown his work at the time of filing had benefits national in scope; the new article and grant post-date the filing and cannot be considered.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirms that the petitioner has not shown his work at the time of filing had benefits national in scope; the new article and grant post-date the filing and cannot be considered.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-19_01_B5203; source_row=17692
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

national interest served to substantially greater degree than U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the petitioner failed to establish that her past record of achievement is at a level sufficient to demonstrate influence on the field as a whole or that she serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than similarly qualified U.S. special education teachers.…

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the petitioner failed to establish that her past record of achievement is at a level sufficient to demonstrate influence on the field as a whole or that she serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than similarly qualified U.S. special education teachers. The NCLBA 'Highly Qualified' standard does not set requirements more stringent than normal job qualifications, and labor shortages are not a basis for a national interest waiver.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-18_02_B5203; source_row=17690
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary meets minimum education requirement on ETA Form 9089 (master's degree in physical therapy or foreign equivalent)

AAO 为什么未被说服

EDGE and AACRAO confirm that a bachelor's degree in physical therapy from the Philippines is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The fact that the U.S. stopped offering baccalaureate PT programs after 2001 does not retroactively elevate the beneficiary's 1996 degree.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
EDGE and AACRAO confirm that a bachelor's degree in physical therapy from the Philippines is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The fact that the U.S. stopped offering baccalaureate PT programs after 2001 does not retroactively elevate the beneficiary's 1996 degree. FCCPT's credentialing authority is limited to admissibility purposes and is not binding on DHS for purposes of determining whether the degree meets the ETA Form 9089 requirements. The FIS evaluation was unsupported by documentary evidence, relied in part on EDGE without addressing EDGE's contrary finding, and was internally inconsistent with the FCCPT evaluation on credit counts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-18_01_B5203; source_row=17686
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

progressive post-baccalaureate experience equivalent to advanced degree

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the letters from school staff and professional development certificates sufficient to demonstrate advancing levels of responsibility and knowledge, establishing more than five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in teaching.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the letters from school staff and professional development certificates sufficient to demonstrate advancing levels of responsibility and knowledge, establishing more than five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in teaching.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-18_02_B5203; source_row=17687
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the reference letters discussed only the petitioner's individual school-level performance and did not demonstrate national-level impact. NYSDOT itself identified a single elementary school teacher as an example of an occupation where the individual worker would not produce benefits national in scope. A local-scale contribution to an overall national effort does not meet the NYSDOT threshold.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the reference letters discussed only the petitioner's individual school-level performance and did not demonstrate national-level impact. NYSDOT itself identified a single elementary school teacher as an example of an occupation where the individual worker would not produce benefits national in scope. A local-scale contribution to an overall national effort does not meet the NYSDOT threshold.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-18_02_B5203; source_row=17689
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that work as an elementary school special education teacher is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that work as an elementary school special education teacher is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-18_02_B5203; source_row=17688
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWprocedural or other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

procedural or other

new facts supported by affidavits or documentary evidence

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO concluded the CPA letters do not present new facts that did not exist at the time of filing or appeal, and even if treated as new, would be insufficient to overcome the grounds of the prior decisions, particularly absent evidence that the underlying required evidence is unavailable or two non-party affidavits.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the CPA letters do not present new facts that did not exist at the time of filing or appeal, and even if treated as new, would be insufficient to overcome the grounds of the prior decisions, particularly absent evidence that the underlying required evidence is unavailable or two non-party affidavits.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-14_01_B5203; source_row=17685
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWprocedural or other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

procedural or other

timely filing / excuse for late filing

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO held the prior motion was untimely and the proffered explanation does not show the delay was beyond the affected party's control, so the basis for the prior untimeliness dismissal stands.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held the prior motion was untimely and the proffered explanation does not show the delay was beyond the affected party's control, so the basis for the prior untimeliness dismissal stands.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-14_01_B5203; source_row=17684
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评