Five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty
AAO 为什么未被说服
The beneficiary's experience with the petitioner in the proffered position could not be counted because it was substantially comparable to the offered position and the labor certification did not allow alternate-occupation experience.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary's experience with the petitioner in the proffered position could not be counted because it was substantially comparable to the offered position and the labor certification did not allow alternate-occupation experience. Adding the two remaining qualifying employment periods (approximately 2 years 10 months with one employer and 11 months 18 days with another), the total qualifying post-baccalaureate experience reaches only about 3 years 7–9 months, far short of the required 60 months as of the priority date of June 29, 2012.
AAO affirmed prior denials, finding the new submissions are not 'new' evidence, are not independent and objective, create additional inconsistencies, and do not cover the complete relevant time period.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed prior denials, finding the new submissions are not 'new' evidence, are not independent and objective, create additional inconsistencies, and do not cover the complete relevant time period.
AAO agreed with the director that the degree, awarded prior to full accreditation, does not qualify as an advanced degree because only full regional accreditation guarantees nationwide recognition; pre-accreditation under TRACS and the H-1B-specific provisions of INA § 214(g)(5) do not control immigrant petitions.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the director that the degree, awarded prior to full accreditation, does not qualify as an advanced degree because only full regional accreditation guarantees nationwide recognition; pre-accreditation under TRACS and the H-1B-specific provisions of INA § 214(g)(5) do not control immigrant petitions.
continuing ability to pay proffered wage from priority date
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO declined to prorate without monthly income statements or pay stubs covering only the post-priority-date period, and noted that the petitioner did not submit the regulatorily required annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to prorate without monthly income statements or pay stubs covering only the post-priority-date period, and noted that the petitioner did not submit the regulatorily required annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements.
Five years of progressive experience in the specialty
AAO 为什么未被说服
Co-worker letters lacked the employer-origin and objectivity required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) and could not independently establish prior employment. The job duties described across all positions were virtually identical, failing to show progression in complexity or responsibility from one role to the next. Consequently, the beneficiary did not demonstrate the requisite five years of progressive experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Co-worker letters lacked the employer-origin and objectivity required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) and could not independently establish prior employment. The job duties described across all positions were virtually identical, failing to show progression in complexity or responsibility from one role to the next. Consequently, the beneficiary did not demonstrate the requisite five years of progressive experience.
serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO finds no documentary evidence that the petitioner has influenced the field as a whole or will benefit the U.S. to a greater extent than similarly qualified chiropractors. Claims of useful skills and unique background relate to labor certification rather than the NIW.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds no documentary evidence that the petitioner has influenced the field as a whole or will benefit the U.S. to a greater extent than similarly qualified chiropractors. Claims of useful skills and unique background relate to labor certification rather than the NIW.
national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner's evidence does not establish that her past record of achievement rises to a level that would justify waiving the job offer requirement. Her qualifications do not exceed the minimum requirements set by the NCLBA's 'Highly Qualified Teacher' standard in a way that would make labor certification impossible, and her publications and awards show no demonstrable national-level influence on the field of education.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's evidence does not establish that her past record of achievement rises to a level that would justify waiving the job offer requirement. Her qualifications do not exceed the minimum requirements set by the NCLBA's 'Highly Qualified Teacher' standard in a way that would make labor certification impossible, and her publications and awards show no demonstrable national-level influence on the field of education.
national interest served to substantially greater degree than U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the unavailability of qualified U.S. workers is not a consideration in NIW determinations; the employer's debarment does not justify a waiver; and the petitioner lacked evidence that her work influenced the field as a whole. The waiver must rest on the petitioner's individual qualifications, not temporary circumstances.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the unavailability of qualified U.S. workers is not a consideration in NIW determinations; the employer's debarment does not justify a waiver; and the petitioner lacked evidence that her work influenced the field as a whole. The waiver must rest on the petitioner's individual qualifications, not temporary circumstances.
AAO finds the impact of one chiropractor's treatment of patients is too attenuated to yield a national effect, and the petitioner's role at a sports competition post-dates filing and cannot establish eligibility. Letters from a handful of out-of-state patients do not establish national scope.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the impact of one chiropractor's treatment of patients is too attenuated to yield a national effect, and the petitioner's role at a sports competition post-dates filing and cannot establish eligibility. Letters from a handful of out-of-state patients do not establish national scope.