可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 20541–20550

EB-1Aother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

intent to continue work in area of expertise

AAO 为什么未被说服

Petitioner submitted no prospective job letters, contracts, or detailed personal statement establishing intent to continue in clinical surgery research; current position is as surgical resident/fellow.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner submitted no prospective job letters, contracts, or detailed personal statement establishing intent to continue in clinical surgery research; current position is as surgical resident/fellow.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-15_01_B2203; source_row=17516
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree (or U.S. bachelor's plus 5 years progressive experience)

AAO 为什么未被说服

The pre-accreditation status was not received until November 2008, after the beneficiary's May 2008 degree, so the degree was awarded by an unaccredited institution and cannot qualify as a U.S. baccalaureate. The credentials evaluation using a 3-for-1 experience equivalency applies to H-1B, not to immigrant petitions, and the regulation does not permit equivalency for this category.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The pre-accreditation status was not received until November 2008, after the beneficiary's May 2008 degree, so the degree was awarded by an unaccredited institution and cannot qualify as a U.S. baccalaureate. The credentials evaluation using a 3-for-1 experience equivalency applies to H-1B, not to immigrant petitions, and the regulation does not permit equivalency for this category.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-14_02_B5203; source_row=17509
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

other

beneficiary meets minimum educational requirements stated on ETA Form 9089

AAO 为什么未被说服

The beneficiary's degree is in Biblical studies, not publishing or a related field as required by Part H of the labor certification, and the record does not establish equivalence to a master's in publishing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary's degree is in Biblical studies, not publishing or a related field as required by Part H of the labor certification, and the record does not establish equivalence to a master's in publishing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-14_02_B5203; source_row=17510
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示未满足

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO rejected the argument that scientific conference presentations qualify under criterion (vii), which is limited to the visual arts. The beneficiary is a surgeon, not a visual artist, and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions or showcases.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO rejected the argument that scientific conference presentations qualify under criterion (vii), which is limited to the visual arts. The beneficiary is a surgeon, not a visual artist, and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions or showcases.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-13_01_B2203; source_row=17503
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

national interest served to substantially greater degree than available U.S. workers

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found that the petitioner's record showed only local impact on her immediate school community and did not demonstrate a nationally significant influence on the field as a whole. The employer's debarment from sponsoring visas does not constitute grounds for a waiver, other schools could petition on her behalf, and mere competence and local recognition are insufficient under NYSDOT.…

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the petitioner's record showed only local impact on her immediate school community and did not demonstrate a nationally significant influence on the field as a whole. The employer's debarment from sponsoring visas does not constitute grounds for a waiver, other schools could petition on her behalf, and mere competence and local recognition are insufficient under NYSDOT. The petitioner failed to show a past record of achievement justifying projections of nationally significant future benefit.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-13_01_B5203; source_row=17508
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

裁决如何说明

The AAO did not separately resolve prong one, instead focusing its analysis on national scope and the petitioner's individual impact compared to U.S. workers. The decision implicitly accepts that education has intrinsic merit but does not make a formal finding on this prong.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO did not separately resolve prong one, instead focusing its analysis on national scope and the petitioner's individual impact compared to U.S. workers. The decision implicitly accepts that education has intrinsic merit but does not make a formal finding on this prong.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-13_01_B5203; source_row=17506
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found that the petitioner's evidence showed only local-level impact on her school community. The NCLB Act did not give national scope to the work of an individual teacher, and participation in a pilot program did not show that the petitioner was responsible for its creation or wider implementation. The overall importance of a statute does not translate to individual national-level benefit for every worker it covers.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the petitioner's evidence showed only local-level impact on her school community. The NCLB Act did not give national scope to the work of an individual teacher, and participation in a pilot program did not show that the petitioner was responsible for its creation or wider implementation. The overall importance of a statute does not translate to individual national-level benefit for every worker it covers.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-13_01_B5203; source_row=17507
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

Both the director and AAO found that the petitioner established the beneficiary satisfies the plain language requirements of criterion (vi).

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the director and AAO found that the petitioner established the beneficiary satisfies the plain language requirements of criterion (vi).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-13_01_B2203; source_row=17502
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

Both the director and AAO found that the petitioner established the beneficiary satisfies the plain language requirements of criterion (iv).

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the director and AAO found that the petitioner established the beneficiary satisfies the plain language requirements of criterion (iv).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-13_01_B2203; source_row=17500
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

数学 / 统计

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the petitioner's qualifications (advanced degree, teaching experience, professional certifications) relate to exceptional ability but exceptional ability is not sufficient for a NIW. The employer's debarment does not substitute for demonstrating national interest. The NCLBA 'Highly Qualified Teacher' standard does not exempt teachers from the job offer requirement.…

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the petitioner's qualifications (advanced degree, teaching experience, professional certifications) relate to exceptional ability but exceptional ability is not sufficient for a NIW. The employer's debarment does not substitute for demonstrating national interest. The NCLBA 'Highly Qualified Teacher' standard does not exempt teachers from the job offer requirement. Reference letters, awards, and evaluations did not show that the petitioner's impact exceeded that of similarly qualified U.S. mathematics teachers.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-10_01_B5203; source_row=17495
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评