可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 20741–20750

NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the petitioner's reference letters and awards were limited to local, regional, or institutional significance and did not show that the benefits of her work extended beyond her school or local district. AAO cited the NYSDOT example that while education is in the national interest, the impact of a single schoolteacher in one elementary school is not national in scope for waiver purposes.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the petitioner's reference letters and awards were limited to local, regional, or institutional significance and did not show that the benefits of her work extended beyond her school or local district. AAO cited the NYSDOT example that while education is in the national interest, the impact of a single schoolteacher in one elementary school is not national in scope for waiver purposes.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_07_B5203; source_row=17303
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO accepted that work as a special educator and hearing resource teacher is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO accepted that work as a special educator and hearing resource teacher is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_07_B5203; source_row=17302
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理硕士

审查的问题

other

ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

No financial documents were submitted and the petitioner did not respond to the NOID requesting ability-to-pay evidence. Neither wages paid to the beneficiary, net income, nor net current assets were established.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
No financial documents were submitted and the petitioner did not respond to the NOID requesting ability-to-pay evidence. Neither wages paid to the beneficiary, net income, nor net current assets were established.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_06_B5203; source_row=17301
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理硕士

审查的问题

other

beneficiary meets minimum requirements of labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

Experience with the petitioner cannot be used because the beneficiary performed the same duties as the offered position and Q J.21 was answered 'no', and the labor cert bars alternate occupation experience. No experience letter from the listed prior employer was provided even after NOID.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Experience with the petitioner cannot be used because the beneficiary performed the same duties as the offered position and Q J.21 was answered 'no', and the labor cert bars alternate occupation experience. No experience letter from the listed prior employer was provided even after NOID.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_06_B5203; source_row=17300
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

advanced degree and experience as of priority date

证据为何得到认可

AAO determined upon full record review that the beneficiary possessed an advanced degree and the required work experience as of the priority date of July 24, 2012.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO determined upon full record review that the beneficiary possessed an advanced degree and the required work experience as of the priority date of July 24, 2012.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_01_B5203; source_row=17292
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner failed to show that the benefits of her work as an elementary school teacher would extend beyond her local school and school district to have a national impact. General arguments about the importance of education and NCLBA only address intrinsic merit and do not establish national scope for an individual teacher's work.…

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner failed to show that the benefits of her work as an elementary school teacher would extend beyond her local school and school district to have a national impact. General arguments about the importance of education and NCLBA only address intrinsic merit and do not establish national scope for an individual teacher's work. The 2012 MSA results cited by counsel actually reflected low rankings for the petitioner's district, undermining the claim of effective national impact.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_09_B5203; source_row=17306
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that elementary school teaching, particularly special education, is an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that elementary school teaching, particularly special education, is an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_09_B5203; source_row=17305
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

labor certification supports advanced degree professional classification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found Kellogg language was not required because the beneficiary qualifies based on the primary requirement, and that the language at issue is not actually Kellogg language. Even under counsel's interpretation, the H.14 language would allow qualification with less than a bachelor's plus five years' experience or a master's, so the labor certification does not support the EB-2 advanced degree professional category.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found Kellogg language was not required because the beneficiary qualifies based on the primary requirement, and that the language at issue is not actually Kellogg language. Even under counsel's interpretation, the H.14 language would allow qualification with less than a bachelor's plus five years' experience or a master's, so the labor certification does not support the EB-2 advanced degree professional category.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-26_02_B5203; source_row=17279
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that the petitioner had not demonstrated continuing ability to pay because the record contains no evidence of wages paid to or proffered wages and priority dates of the 18 additional sponsored workers, and excess payments to some workers do not establish funds available to pay others.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the petitioner had not demonstrated continuing ability to pay because the record contains no evidence of wages paid to or proffered wages and priority dates of the 18 additional sponsored workers, and excess payments to some workers do not establish funds available to pay others.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-26_02_B5203; source_row=17280
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary meets experience requirements of the labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found that the experience letter from the prior employer described duties of a System Network Engineer rather than a Business Development Specialist, and the petitioner's own president confirmed the two positions were completely different. Additionally, an unresolved discrepancy between the Pakistan experience letter and other record documents prevented reliance on that experience.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the experience letter from the prior employer described duties of a System Network Engineer rather than a Business Development Specialist, and the petitioner's own president confirmed the two positions were completely different. Additionally, an unresolved discrepancy between the Pakistan experience letter and other record documents prevented reliance on that experience.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-26_03_B5203; source_row=17281
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评