national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the petitioner's credentials (full certification held by 92% of special educators, post-baccalaureate equivalent rather than a master's degree) do not differentiate her substantially from available U.S. workers. Unsupported assertions of counsel about the superiority of the petitioner or foreign teachers as a class do not constitute evidence.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the petitioner's credentials (full certification held by 92% of special educators, post-baccalaureate equivalent rather than a master's degree) do not differentiate her substantially from available U.S. workers. Unsupported assertions of counsel about the superiority of the petitioner or foreign teachers as a class do not constitute evidence.
AAO agrees the petitioner's work is local in nature; awards and witness letters did not establish impact beyond the local level. NYSDOT itself cites elementary school teachers as an example of an occupation lacking national scope.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees the petitioner's work is local in nature; awards and witness letters did not establish impact beyond the local level. NYSDOT itself cites elementary school teachers as an example of an occupation lacking national scope.
Although net income and net current assets exceeded the proffered wage in some years, the petitioner had filed multiple immigrant petitions and submitted no evidence of ability to pay all sponsored beneficiaries, nor any evidence for 2007–2012.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although net income and net current assets exceeded the proffered wage in some years, the petitioner had filed multiple immigrant petitions and submitted no evidence of ability to pay all sponsored beneficiaries, nor any evidence for 2007–2012.
two years experience as a cook as of priority date
AAO 为什么未被说服
The employment letter was deficient and inconsistencies among the labor certification and two G-325A forms regarding the beneficiary's prior employment dates were unresolved.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The employment letter was deficient and inconsistencies among the labor certification and two G-325A forms regarding the beneficiary's prior employment dates were unresolved.
AAO agreed that a degree from an unaccredited institution does not qualify under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2), and that SEVP approval and California state operating approval do not equate to accreditation by a recognized agency.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that a degree from an unaccredited institution does not qualify under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2), and that SEVP approval and California state operating approval do not equate to accreditation by a recognized agency.
Possession of an advanced degree or foreign equivalent
AAO 为什么未被说服
EDGE states the Indian Master of Commerce is only comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a U.S. master's degree. The expert letters were unpersuasive because the Indian program is built on a three-year bachelor's, unlike the four-year bachelor's that underlies comparable five-year programs in the U.S. and other countries cited by experts. No expert opinion can supersede EDGE's peer-reviewed conclusions.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
EDGE states the Indian Master of Commerce is only comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a U.S. master's degree. The expert letters were unpersuasive because the Indian program is built on a three-year bachelor's, unlike the four-year bachelor's that underlies comparable five-year programs in the U.S. and other countries cited by experts. No expert opinion can supersede EDGE's peer-reviewed conclusions.