可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 20821–20830

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay via totality of circumstances (Sonegawa)

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record lacked evidence of the petitioner's industry reputation, historical growth, or consistent employee count, and provided no evidence of net income or net current assets for 2011 onward. Considering the totality of circumstances, the petitioner failed to establish ability to pay.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record lacked evidence of the petitioner's industry reputation, historical growth, or consistent employee count, and provided no evidence of net income or net current assets for 2011 onward. Considering the totality of circumstances, the petitioner failed to establish ability to pay.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_01_B5203; source_row=17178
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

The expert letters were vague or speculative regarding actual impact, the citation evidence was limited and not commensurate with major-impact articles, and there was no evidence of widespread implementation such as hospital guidelines or wide use of the textbooks.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The expert letters were vague or speculative regarding actual impact, the citation evidence was limited and not commensurate with major-impact articles, and there was no evidence of widespread implementation such as hospital guidelines or wide use of the textbooks.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_03_B2203; source_row=17187
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the director's conclusion that the petitioner met this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the director's conclusion that the petitioner met this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_03_B2203; source_row=17188
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the director that the record contains sufficient documentation to meet the plain-language requirements of the criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the director that the record contains sufficient documentation to meet the plain-language requirements of the criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_03_B2203; source_row=17186
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

five years of full-time work experience in the proffered position

AAO 为什么未被说服

The experience letters are insufficient: one certificate covers only about one year of employment, and the Municipal Health Officer certifications do not confirm full-time employment, appear to be from coworkers rather than employers, and conflict with entries on the ETA Form 9089.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The experience letters are insufficient: one certificate covers only about one year of employment, and the Municipal Health Officer certifications do not confirm full-time employment, appear to be from coworkers rather than employers, and conflict with entries on the ETA Form 9089.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_03_B5203; source_row=17193
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

successor-in-interest qualification

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the petitioner satisfied all requirements under Matter of Dial Auto Repair Shop, Inc. and the AFM for amending a previously approved I-140 as a successor-in-interest.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner satisfied all requirements under Matter of Dial Auto Repair Shop, Inc. and the AFM for amending a previously approved I-140 as a successor-in-interest.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_03_B5203; source_row=17191
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

educational requirement (bachelor's degree in physical therapy)

证据为何得到认可

The record includes a copy of the beneficiary's bachelor of science in physical therapy and academic transcripts confirming the educational requirement is satisfied.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record includes a copy of the beneficiary's bachelor of science in physical therapy and academic transcripts confirming the educational requirement is satisfied.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_03_B5203; source_row=17192
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

裁决如何说明

The petitioner did not identify any factual or legal error relating to this criterion on appeal, so the AAO deemed the claim abandoned.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not identify any factual or legal error relating to this criterion on appeal, so the AAO deemed the claim abandoned.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_04_B2203; source_row=17195
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner met this criterion and the record supports the director's conclusions.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner met this criterion and the record supports the director's conclusions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_04_B2203; source_row=17197
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

The AAO held that a final merits determination was unnecessary because the petitioner did not first satisfy the initial evidence requirement of three evidentiary criteria, though it noted its view that the evidence would not satisfy the final merits standard.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO held that a final merits determination was unnecessary because the petitioner did not first satisfy the initial evidence requirement of three evidentiary criteria, though it noted its view that the evidence would not satisfy the final merits standard.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_04_B2203; source_row=17201
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评